主要图着色算法的比较分析

J. Postigo, Juan Soto-Begazo, Villarroel R. Fiorela, Gleddynuri M. Picha, Roxana Flores-Quispe, Yuber Velazco-Paredes
{"title":"主要图着色算法的比较分析","authors":"J. Postigo, Juan Soto-Begazo, Villarroel R. Fiorela, Gleddynuri M. Picha, Roxana Flores-Quispe, Yuber Velazco-Paredes","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM52710.2021.9486299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The graph coloring problem, GCP, beyond theoretical interest, it has significant practical importance due to the frequent real-life situations in which problems arise that can be modeled as a graph coloring problem. In this research, algorithms dedicated to solving the Graph Coloring Problem such as Greedy, Dsatur, RLF, AntCOL and TabuCol are described, making an objective comparison between them, reviewing parameters such as the computational time used by these, the memory of quantities and its performance as a function of the number of vertices and edges. The experimental results show that the most efficient algorithms in speed are the Greedy and dsatur. On the other hand, the tabucol and AntCol algorithms show a notable difference of inefficiency compared to large graphs, finding very good solutions, in addition, although the RLF algorithm is generally memory deficient, it presents solutions with high quality. Consequently, certain applications benefited by these algorithms are known.","PeriodicalId":112859,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the main Graph Coloring Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"J. Postigo, Juan Soto-Begazo, Villarroel R. Fiorela, Gleddynuri M. Picha, Roxana Flores-Quispe, Yuber Velazco-Paredes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COLCOM52710.2021.9486299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The graph coloring problem, GCP, beyond theoretical interest, it has significant practical importance due to the frequent real-life situations in which problems arise that can be modeled as a graph coloring problem. In this research, algorithms dedicated to solving the Graph Coloring Problem such as Greedy, Dsatur, RLF, AntCOL and TabuCol are described, making an objective comparison between them, reviewing parameters such as the computational time used by these, the memory of quantities and its performance as a function of the number of vertices and edges. The experimental results show that the most efficient algorithms in speed are the Greedy and dsatur. On the other hand, the tabucol and AntCol algorithms show a notable difference of inefficiency compared to large graphs, finding very good solutions, in addition, although the RLF algorithm is generally memory deficient, it presents solutions with high quality. Consequently, certain applications benefited by these algorithms are known.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM52710.2021.9486299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM52710.2021.9486299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图的着色问题,GCP,超越了理论的兴趣,它具有重要的实际意义,因为在现实生活中经常出现的问题可以被建模为图的着色问题。在本研究中,描述了用于解决图着色问题的算法,如贪心、Dsatur、RLF、AntCOL和TabuCol,并对它们进行了客观比较,回顾了这些算法使用的计算时间、数量的记忆及其作为顶点和边数的函数的性能等参数。实验结果表明,在速度上最有效的算法是贪心算法和不饱和算法。另一方面,tabucol和AntCol算法与大图相比,效率低下的差异明显,找到了非常好的解,此外,尽管RLF算法普遍存在内存不足的问题,但它给出了高质量的解。因此,某些应用程序受益于这些算法是已知的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of the main Graph Coloring Algorithms
The graph coloring problem, GCP, beyond theoretical interest, it has significant practical importance due to the frequent real-life situations in which problems arise that can be modeled as a graph coloring problem. In this research, algorithms dedicated to solving the Graph Coloring Problem such as Greedy, Dsatur, RLF, AntCOL and TabuCol are described, making an objective comparison between them, reviewing parameters such as the computational time used by these, the memory of quantities and its performance as a function of the number of vertices and edges. The experimental results show that the most efficient algorithms in speed are the Greedy and dsatur. On the other hand, the tabucol and AntCol algorithms show a notable difference of inefficiency compared to large graphs, finding very good solutions, in addition, although the RLF algorithm is generally memory deficient, it presents solutions with high quality. Consequently, certain applications benefited by these algorithms are known.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solving the distribution and transportation of multi-depot vehicle routing problem based on Genetic Algorithms Experimental Proof of Concept Applying Digital Predistortion to Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers A methodology for signals intelligence using non-conventional techniques and software-defined radio Comparative Analysis of the main Graph Coloring Algorithms Linear and Non-linear Effects in Fiber Optic Transmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1