{"title":"探索项目中的混沌绩效及其与知识创造过程的关系","authors":"R. A. Samra, K. Shaalan","doi":"10.1145/2925995.2926021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study the researcher is focusing on the performance of the project. During the life cycle of projects managers are striving to forecast the future performance of the project according to the historical patterns of performance. Irregular performance and randomness are representing chaotic performance periods in project's life. The study proposes five propositions. The first proposition is that Manager have different conscious perceptions about accepted levels of order and chaos in their project performance. The second proposition is that Knowledge Creation Process has different characteristics in chaotic perceived projects and order perceived projects. The third proposition is that managers have different prioritization of knowledge assets from which they create new knowledge for chaotic performance projects. The fourth proposition is that Sources of knowledge creation differ according to the context of project performance. The fifth proposition is that Assets used for knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods differ according to managers' tendency to innovate. This study is a qualitative analysis of secondary data that comes from literature review and primary data that comes from interviews with experts and project managers. The researcher investigated four styles of knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods; experiential knowledge creation style, innovative knowledge creation style, precautions and risk minimization knowledge creation style, and specialty based knowledge creation style. Conclusions and recommendations are provided to project managers on which knowledge assets are leading to innovative knowledge creation.","PeriodicalId":159180,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society","volume":"420 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Chaotic Performance in Projects and its Relationship with Knowledge Creation Process\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Samra, K. Shaalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2925995.2926021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study the researcher is focusing on the performance of the project. During the life cycle of projects managers are striving to forecast the future performance of the project according to the historical patterns of performance. Irregular performance and randomness are representing chaotic performance periods in project's life. The study proposes five propositions. The first proposition is that Manager have different conscious perceptions about accepted levels of order and chaos in their project performance. The second proposition is that Knowledge Creation Process has different characteristics in chaotic perceived projects and order perceived projects. The third proposition is that managers have different prioritization of knowledge assets from which they create new knowledge for chaotic performance projects. The fourth proposition is that Sources of knowledge creation differ according to the context of project performance. The fifth proposition is that Assets used for knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods differ according to managers' tendency to innovate. This study is a qualitative analysis of secondary data that comes from literature review and primary data that comes from interviews with experts and project managers. The researcher investigated four styles of knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods; experiential knowledge creation style, innovative knowledge creation style, precautions and risk minimization knowledge creation style, and specialty based knowledge creation style. Conclusions and recommendations are provided to project managers on which knowledge assets are leading to innovative knowledge creation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society\",\"volume\":\"420 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2925995.2926021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2925995.2926021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,研究人员关注的是项目的绩效。在项目生命周期中,项目经理努力根据项目的历史绩效模式来预测项目的未来绩效。不规则性能和随机性代表了项目生命周期的混沌性能阶段。该研究提出了五个主张。第一个命题是,经理对项目绩效中可接受的有序和混乱程度有不同的意识感知。第二个命题是知识创造过程在混沌感知项目和有序感知项目中具有不同的特征。第三个命题是,管理者对知识资产有不同的优先级,他们从这些资产中为混乱的绩效项目创造新的知识。第四个命题是,知识创造的来源根据项目绩效的背景而不同。第五个命题是,在混乱绩效时期,用于知识创造的资产根据管理者的创新倾向而有所不同。本研究是对来自文献综述的次要数据和来自专家和项目经理访谈的主要数据的定性分析。研究了企业在混乱绩效期的四种知识创造模式;体验型知识创造模式、创新型知识创造模式、防范与风险最小化型知识创造模式、专业型知识创造模式。结论和建议提供给项目经理的知识资产是导致创新的知识创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Chaotic Performance in Projects and its Relationship with Knowledge Creation Process
In this study the researcher is focusing on the performance of the project. During the life cycle of projects managers are striving to forecast the future performance of the project according to the historical patterns of performance. Irregular performance and randomness are representing chaotic performance periods in project's life. The study proposes five propositions. The first proposition is that Manager have different conscious perceptions about accepted levels of order and chaos in their project performance. The second proposition is that Knowledge Creation Process has different characteristics in chaotic perceived projects and order perceived projects. The third proposition is that managers have different prioritization of knowledge assets from which they create new knowledge for chaotic performance projects. The fourth proposition is that Sources of knowledge creation differ according to the context of project performance. The fifth proposition is that Assets used for knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods differ according to managers' tendency to innovate. This study is a qualitative analysis of secondary data that comes from literature review and primary data that comes from interviews with experts and project managers. The researcher investigated four styles of knowledge creation during chaotic performance periods; experiential knowledge creation style, innovative knowledge creation style, precautions and risk minimization knowledge creation style, and specialty based knowledge creation style. Conclusions and recommendations are provided to project managers on which knowledge assets are leading to innovative knowledge creation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating Supply Chain by the Supply Chain Operation Referential Model Agent based Semantic Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Health care The Perceived Values of Service Industry Innovation Research Subsidiary in Taiwan Positive Knowledge Management: Changing Perceptions towards Knowledge Processes in Organizations Study on dual K-means algorithm in collaborative filtering system based on web log
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1