Lene Mejlby, Olivier Danvy
{"title":"Hvorfor er der så få kvindelige datalogistuderende","authors":"Lene Mejlby, Olivier Danvy","doi":"10.7146/AUL.212.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Master's thesis investigates the reasons why there are so few female students in Computer Science. More specifically, the thesis investigates what attracts both men and women to computer science, on what criterions they base their choice of education, and which pros and cons women experience as a result of their gender during their studies and later in their worklife. Furthermore, the study looks into the assumptions of current students and graduates concerning why so few women are attracted to Computer Science. The reason for investigating this subject is that there is a rising need in Denmark for people with higher education in IT – especially within the traditional, theoretical, mathematical founded fields of education such as Computer Science. Surprisingly few women apply for these fields compared to traditional other scientific ones. The investigation employs qualitatively designed online questionnaires. They are evaluated through Healy and Perry's assessment criterions. The evaluation is extended by Guba and Lincoln's transferability criterion. A total of 139 students, graduates and former participants in it-camp for piger (IT Camp For Girls) responded to the questionnaires. The analysis of their answers shows that on the whole, women are attracted to Computer Science because of its mathematical foundations. It also shows that both men and women presume that the low number of female applicants to Computer Science is caused by various factors including the following ones: the education is dominated by men, prejudices concerning women's technical abilities are prevalent, and the education suffers from a poor image, since computer scientists are pictured as stereotypical geeks spending their life alone at their desk. It might be worthwhile to expand the investigation to include, for instance, respondents from other countries or with another education.","PeriodicalId":126978,"journal":{"name":"AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/AUL.212.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇硕士论文调查了计算机科学专业女生很少的原因。更具体地说,这篇论文调查了计算机科学吸引男性和女性的原因,他们选择教育的标准是什么,以及女性在学习和后来的工作生活中因性别而经历的利弊。此外,该研究还调查了在校学生和毕业生关于为什么很少有女性被计算机科学吸引的假设。调查这一主题的原因是,丹麦对受过高等信息技术教育的人的需求不断增加,尤其是在传统的、理论的、数学基础的教育领域,如计算机科学。令人惊讶的是,与传统的其他科学领域相比,很少有女性申请这些领域。本调查采用定性设计的在线问卷。他们通过Healy和Perry的评估标准进行评估。根据Guba和Lincoln的可转移性标准对评价进行了扩展。共有139名学生、毕业生和曾经参加过猪IT营(女孩IT营)的人回答了问卷。对答案的分析表明,总体而言,女性被计算机科学所吸引是因为它的数学基础。研究还表明,男性和女性都认为,女性申请计算机科学的人数较少是由以下各种因素造成的:教育由男性主导,对女性技术能力的偏见普遍存在,以及教育形象不佳,因为计算机科学家被描绘成刻板的极客,独自一人在办公桌前度过一生。可能值得扩大调查范围,例如包括来自其他国家或接受其他教育的受访者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hvorfor er der så få kvindelige datalogistuderende
This Master's thesis investigates the reasons why there are so few female students in Computer Science. More specifically, the thesis investigates what attracts both men and women to computer science, on what criterions they base their choice of education, and which pros and cons women experience as a result of their gender during their studies and later in their worklife. Furthermore, the study looks into the assumptions of current students and graduates concerning why so few women are attracted to Computer Science. The reason for investigating this subject is that there is a rising need in Denmark for people with higher education in IT – especially within the traditional, theoretical, mathematical founded fields of education such as Computer Science. Surprisingly few women apply for these fields compared to traditional other scientific ones. The investigation employs qualitatively designed online questionnaires. They are evaluated through Healy and Perry's assessment criterions. The evaluation is extended by Guba and Lincoln's transferability criterion. A total of 139 students, graduates and former participants in it-camp for piger (IT Camp For Girls) responded to the questionnaires. The analysis of their answers shows that on the whole, women are attracted to Computer Science because of its mathematical foundations. It also shows that both men and women presume that the low number of female applicants to Computer Science is caused by various factors including the following ones: the education is dominated by men, prejudices concerning women's technical abilities are prevalent, and the education suffers from a poor image, since computer scientists are pictured as stereotypical geeks spending their life alone at their desk. It might be worthwhile to expand the investigation to include, for instance, respondents from other countries or with another education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating Supply Chain Resilience Through Scenario Planning: How a Digital Twin Can Be Used To Enhance Supply Chain Resilience Through Scenario Planning Implementation and applications of harvest fleet route planning Deltagelse i kulturhuse og andre borgerinvolverende kulturinstitutioner ”Vokalhelvedet”: hvor svær er dansk udtale, og hvordan undervises der i udtale for andetsprogstalere? Podcastlytteren som hverdagskurator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1