{"title":"并行程序执行中的处理器调度","authors":"J. Fang","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The different processor scheduling approaches in parallel program execution are introduced and compared. On the basis of simulation results, it is concluded that the best choice of a runtime model for parallel programming depends on the nature of the application programs and the hardware architecture.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":339677,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processor scheduling in parallel program execution\",\"authors\":\"J. Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The different processor scheduling approaches in parallel program execution are introduced and compared. On the basis of simulation results, it is concluded that the best choice of a runtime model for parallel programming depends on the nature of the application programs and the hardware architecture.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":339677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍并比较了并行程序执行中不同的处理器调度方法。在仿真结果的基础上,得出并行编程运行时模型的最佳选择取决于应用程序的性质和硬件体系结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Processor scheduling in parallel program execution
The different processor scheduling approaches in parallel program execution are introduced and compared. On the basis of simulation results, it is concluded that the best choice of a runtime model for parallel programming depends on the nature of the application programs and the hardware architecture.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the 'carry over effects' in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach? Critical issues in real-time software systems Models to estimate the number of faults still resident in the software after test/debug process Evaluating software development environment quality Structuring large versioned software products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1