监督的监督:教育部对高等教育机构绩效有效性进行监督的新方法有什么问题?

V. Bolotov, G. Motova, V. Navodnov
{"title":"监督的监督:教育部对高等教育机构绩效有效性进行监督的新方法有什么问题?","authors":"V. Bolotov, G. Motova, V. Navodnov","doi":"10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the Monitoring of higher education institutions’ (HEIs’) effectiveness, which has been conducted annually by the Ministry of Education and Science in the last five years. The method of the Monitoring is based on the technology of collecting and systematizing information used by the state accreditation in 1997–2010. The reasons for the introduction of the Monitoring by the Ministry are described; the features of the performance indicators are justified by the state educational policy. A model of presentation of the Monitoring results in the league table format is suggested, which makes it possible to use its results more flexibly for the management of the higher education system. It also allows higher education institutions to analyze their positions and to form their own ways of the development.","PeriodicalId":310472,"journal":{"name":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MONITORING OF MONITORING: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MINISTRY’S NEW APPROACH TO SUPERVISION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ PERFORMANCE?\",\"authors\":\"V. Bolotov, G. Motova, V. Navodnov\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the Monitoring of higher education institutions’ (HEIs’) effectiveness, which has been conducted annually by the Ministry of Education and Science in the last five years. The method of the Monitoring is based on the technology of collecting and systematizing information used by the state accreditation in 1997–2010. The reasons for the introduction of the Monitoring by the Ministry are described; the features of the performance indicators are justified by the state educational policy. A model of presentation of the Monitoring results in the league table format is suggested, which makes it possible to use its results more flexibly for the management of the higher education system. It also allows higher education institutions to analyze their positions and to form their own ways of the development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University Management: Practice and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University Management: Practice and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了教育和科学部在过去五年中每年进行的高等教育机构€™(heis€™)有效性监测。监测方法是基于1997 - - 2010年国家认证使用的信息收集和系统化技术。说明了该部实行监测的原因;国家教育政策证明了绩效指标的特点是合理的。建议采用一种以排名表形式提出监测结果的模式,以便能够更灵活地将其结果用于高等教育系统的管理。这也使高等院校能够分析自己的定位,形成自己的发展之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE MONITORING OF MONITORING: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MINISTRY’S NEW APPROACH TO SUPERVISION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ PERFORMANCE?
The article discusses the Monitoring of higher education institutions’ (HEIs’) effectiveness, which has been conducted annually by the Ministry of Education and Science in the last five years. The method of the Monitoring is based on the technology of collecting and systematizing information used by the state accreditation in 1997–2010. The reasons for the introduction of the Monitoring by the Ministry are described; the features of the performance indicators are justified by the state educational policy. A model of presentation of the Monitoring results in the league table format is suggested, which makes it possible to use its results more flexibly for the management of the higher education system. It also allows higher education institutions to analyze their positions and to form their own ways of the development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Features of Informal Educational Campus Spaces Labor Involvement of Employees of Higher Education Institutions: Based on Corporate Projects Centres for Teaching and Learning of the World’s Leading Universities: Best Practices Review Ecosystem-Type Universities’ Formation Dialectics and Its Influence Over Future Specialists Critical Review of the University Management Practices Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1