E. Loginov, M. V. Gavrilov, Andrew V. Mertsalov, Artem T. Iunusov
{"title":"道德责任的伦理学与形而上学","authors":"E. Loginov, M. V. Gavrilov, Andrew V. Mertsalov, Artem T. Iunusov","doi":"10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-2-5-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text presents the result of the work of our research group carried out in 2019–2020. The research has focused on the debate on moral responsibility in analytical philosophy in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The full results of the study are presented in the collective work “Prolegomena to moral responsibility” (see: Loginov E.V., Gavrilov M.V., Mertsalov A.V., Iunusov A.T. “Prolegomeny k moral’noi otvetstvennosti” [Prolegomena to Moral Responsibility], Finikovyi kompot [Date Palm Compote], 2020, No. 15, pp. 3–100. (In Russian)). Although Prolegomena was conceived primarily as a survey work, it also presents its authors’ own ideas, mostly of a metatheoretical ones. In this paper these ideas are summarised briefly in the following order: a) the problem statement in general terms, b) a discussion of ethics and metaphysics of moral responsibility, and c) a consideration of an important question having to do with the nature of the relation of “appropriateness” of moral reactions.","PeriodicalId":360102,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Thought","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and Metaphysics of Moral Responsibility\",\"authors\":\"E. Loginov, M. V. Gavrilov, Andrew V. Mertsalov, Artem T. Iunusov\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-2-5-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text presents the result of the work of our research group carried out in 2019–2020. The research has focused on the debate on moral responsibility in analytical philosophy in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The full results of the study are presented in the collective work “Prolegomena to moral responsibility” (see: Loginov E.V., Gavrilov M.V., Mertsalov A.V., Iunusov A.T. “Prolegomeny k moral’noi otvetstvennosti” [Prolegomena to Moral Responsibility], Finikovyi kompot [Date Palm Compote], 2020, No. 15, pp. 3–100. (In Russian)). Although Prolegomena was conceived primarily as a survey work, it also presents its authors’ own ideas, mostly of a metatheoretical ones. In this paper these ideas are summarised briefly in the following order: a) the problem statement in general terms, b) a discussion of ethics and metaphysics of moral responsibility, and c) a consideration of an important question having to do with the nature of the relation of “appropriateness” of moral reactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-2-5-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-2-5-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文介绍了我们课题组在2019-2020年开展的工作成果。该研究集中于20世纪下半叶和21世纪初分析哲学中关于道德责任的辩论。该研究的全部结果发表在集体著作“道德责任导论”中(见:Loginov e.v., Gavrilov m.v., Mertsalov a.v., Iunusov A.T.“Prolegomeny k moral 'noi otvetstvennosti”[道德责任导论],Finikovyi kompot[枣椰树],2020,第15期,第3-100页)。(俄罗斯))。虽然《导论》最初是作为一部概括性著作来构思的,但它也提出了作者自己的观点,主要是一种元理论的观点。在本文中,这些观点按以下顺序简要总结:a)问题的一般表述,b)道德责任的伦理学和形而上学的讨论,以及c)考虑与道德反应的“适当性”关系的本质有关的一个重要问题。
This text presents the result of the work of our research group carried out in 2019–2020. The research has focused on the debate on moral responsibility in analytical philosophy in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The full results of the study are presented in the collective work “Prolegomena to moral responsibility” (see: Loginov E.V., Gavrilov M.V., Mertsalov A.V., Iunusov A.T. “Prolegomeny k moral’noi otvetstvennosti” [Prolegomena to Moral Responsibility], Finikovyi kompot [Date Palm Compote], 2020, No. 15, pp. 3–100. (In Russian)). Although Prolegomena was conceived primarily as a survey work, it also presents its authors’ own ideas, mostly of a metatheoretical ones. In this paper these ideas are summarised briefly in the following order: a) the problem statement in general terms, b) a discussion of ethics and metaphysics of moral responsibility, and c) a consideration of an important question having to do with the nature of the relation of “appropriateness” of moral reactions.