组织民主的局限性

Jeffrey L. Kerr
{"title":"组织民主的局限性","authors":"Jeffrey L. Kerr","doi":"10.5465/AME.2004.14776172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Executive Overview Despite decades of encouragement from theorists and consultants, managers have generally not embraced democratic process as a system of management and decision-making in organizations. While it is tempting to explain this state of affairs in terms of managers' reluctance to share power, this article considers the possibility that democracy's limited success is due to its own limitations as a system of organizational governance. The article questions two common assumptions: (a) that political democracy provides a useful model for organizational democracy, and (b) that democratic process is applicable in all organizations. Close analysis suggests that political democracy provides little guidance for organizational democracy because its essential characteristics—accountability to the governed, right of participation, free exchange of information, and right of representation—are rarely, if ever, supported in organizations. Furthermore, the basic function of political democracy—legitimizatio...","PeriodicalId":337734,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Executive","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The limits of organizational democracy\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey L. Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/AME.2004.14776172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Executive Overview Despite decades of encouragement from theorists and consultants, managers have generally not embraced democratic process as a system of management and decision-making in organizations. While it is tempting to explain this state of affairs in terms of managers' reluctance to share power, this article considers the possibility that democracy's limited success is due to its own limitations as a system of organizational governance. The article questions two common assumptions: (a) that political democracy provides a useful model for organizational democracy, and (b) that democratic process is applicable in all organizations. Close analysis suggests that political democracy provides little guidance for organizational democracy because its essential characteristics—accountability to the governed, right of participation, free exchange of information, and right of representation—are rarely, if ever, supported in organizations. Furthermore, the basic function of political democracy—legitimizatio...\",\"PeriodicalId\":337734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Executive\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Executive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.14776172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Executive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.14776172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

尽管几十年来理论家和顾问一直在鼓励,但管理人员普遍没有将民主进程作为组织管理和决策的一种制度。虽然很容易将这种状况解释为管理者不愿分享权力,但本文考虑了民主有限成功的可能性,即民主作为一种组织治理体系的局限性。这篇文章质疑了两个常见的假设:(a)政治民主为组织民主提供了一个有用的模型,(b)民主进程适用于所有组织。仔细分析表明,政治民主对组织民主几乎没有指导作用,因为它的基本特征——对被统治者负责、参与权、信息自由交换和代表权——在组织中很少得到支持,如果有的话。此外,政治民主的基本功能——合法化……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The limits of organizational democracy
Executive Overview Despite decades of encouragement from theorists and consultants, managers have generally not embraced democratic process as a system of management and decision-making in organizations. While it is tempting to explain this state of affairs in terms of managers' reluctance to share power, this article considers the possibility that democracy's limited success is due to its own limitations as a system of organizational governance. The article questions two common assumptions: (a) that political democracy provides a useful model for organizational democracy, and (b) that democratic process is applicable in all organizations. Close analysis suggests that political democracy provides little guidance for organizational democracy because its essential characteristics—accountability to the governed, right of participation, free exchange of information, and right of representation—are rarely, if ever, supported in organizations. Furthermore, the basic function of political democracy—legitimizatio...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the performance feedback gap with expert systems Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out“ revolution The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship Executives Ask: How and why should firms and their employees set goals? Editor's introduction: Establishing organizational goals and rewards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1