保加利亚外国直接投资的决定因素

Assia Hadjit, E. Moxon-Browne
{"title":"保加利亚外国直接投资的决定因素","authors":"Assia Hadjit, E. Moxon-Browne","doi":"10.1080/14613190601004913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the end of 2007, two more countries, Bulgaria and Romania, are now confidently expected to become full members of the European Union (EU). This further extension of the Union into southeastern Europe represents a consolidation of the integration process in the region and lays the foundations for future enlargement to, firstly, Croatia, and then the rest of thewestern Balkans. The internal economic and political development of these latter countries is now anchored in the prospect of EUmembership and there is a real sense in which we can observe the ‘political conditionality’ imposed by Brussels acting as a magnet for democratic reform processes in the region. Bulgaria and Romania have acted as rolemodels and the fragility of their reformprocesses offers both an inspiration and a warning to the rest of the region in its bid to integrate itself more closely to the EU. The warning lies in the fact that the Commission can still delay Romanian or Bulgarian accession if the momentum falters or fades, and the inspiration lies in the encouragement and flexibility displayed by Brussels towards these two applicants. Even after they join, much will depend on how their economies and political systems actually adapt to the challenges of the single market. While it may be true that membership will itself solve some of the problems that remain, this cannot be taken for granted. In particular, the competitiveness of these two economies will be rigorously tested as much by other Central and East European member states as by the more well-established but high-cost economies of western Europe. In this context, the ability of Bulgaria and Romania to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) will be the real litmus test of their integration into EU25. The capacity of any economy to absorb FDI reflects a broad spectrum of political and economic attributes: infrastructure, skill levels in the workforce, the banking system, administrative and legal systems, and an atmosphere of political ‘trust’ between donor and recipient countries. Bearing such hypotheses in mind, this paper explores the specific factors that have inhibited FDI in Bulgaria in recent years; and assesses the implications for Bulgarian membership of the EU. We do this in the belief that any country’s propensity to attract FDI is reflective of its broader acceptance of the norms and values that guide externally sourced investment decisions. This aspect of Bulgaria’s relationship with the EU has been relatively neglected in the academic","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of foreign direct investment in Bulgaria\",\"authors\":\"Assia Hadjit, E. Moxon-Browne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190601004913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By the end of 2007, two more countries, Bulgaria and Romania, are now confidently expected to become full members of the European Union (EU). This further extension of the Union into southeastern Europe represents a consolidation of the integration process in the region and lays the foundations for future enlargement to, firstly, Croatia, and then the rest of thewestern Balkans. The internal economic and political development of these latter countries is now anchored in the prospect of EUmembership and there is a real sense in which we can observe the ‘political conditionality’ imposed by Brussels acting as a magnet for democratic reform processes in the region. Bulgaria and Romania have acted as rolemodels and the fragility of their reformprocesses offers both an inspiration and a warning to the rest of the region in its bid to integrate itself more closely to the EU. The warning lies in the fact that the Commission can still delay Romanian or Bulgarian accession if the momentum falters or fades, and the inspiration lies in the encouragement and flexibility displayed by Brussels towards these two applicants. Even after they join, much will depend on how their economies and political systems actually adapt to the challenges of the single market. While it may be true that membership will itself solve some of the problems that remain, this cannot be taken for granted. In particular, the competitiveness of these two economies will be rigorously tested as much by other Central and East European member states as by the more well-established but high-cost economies of western Europe. In this context, the ability of Bulgaria and Romania to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) will be the real litmus test of their integration into EU25. The capacity of any economy to absorb FDI reflects a broad spectrum of political and economic attributes: infrastructure, skill levels in the workforce, the banking system, administrative and legal systems, and an atmosphere of political ‘trust’ between donor and recipient countries. Bearing such hypotheses in mind, this paper explores the specific factors that have inhibited FDI in Bulgaria in recent years; and assesses the implications for Bulgarian membership of the EU. We do this in the belief that any country’s propensity to attract FDI is reflective of its broader acceptance of the norms and values that guide externally sourced investment decisions. This aspect of Bulgaria’s relationship with the EU has been relatively neglected in the academic\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190601004913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190601004913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

到2007年底,又有两个国家——保加利亚和罗马尼亚——有望成为欧盟的正式成员。欧盟向东南欧的进一步扩展代表了该地区一体化进程的巩固,并为今后扩大到克罗地亚,然后是西巴尔干其他国家奠定了基础。这些后一种国家的内部经济和政治发展现在都与加入欧盟的前景息息相关,我们可以真正感受到布鲁塞尔施加的“政治条件”,它就像一块磁铁,吸引着该地区的民主改革进程。保加利亚和罗马尼亚已成为榜样,它们改革进程的脆弱性对该地区其他国家在努力更紧密地融入欧盟的过程中,既是一种鼓舞,也是一种警告。警告在于,如果势头减弱或消退,委员会仍然可以推迟罗马尼亚或保加利亚的加入,而鼓舞在于布鲁塞尔对这两个申请人所表现的鼓励和灵活性。即使在它们加入欧盟之后,很大程度上也取决于它们的经济和政治体系如何适应单一市场的挑战。虽然成员资格本身可能确实会解决仍然存在的一些问题,但不能想当然地认为这是理所当然的。特别是,这两个经济体的竞争力将受到其他中欧和东欧成员国以及更成熟但成本较高的西欧经济体的严格考验。在这方面,保加利亚和罗马尼亚吸引外国直接投资的能力将是它们是否加入欧盟25国的真正试金石。任何经济体吸收外国直接投资的能力都反映了广泛的政治和经济属性:基础设施、劳动力的技能水平、银行系统、行政和法律系统,以及捐助国和受援国之间的政治“信任”气氛。考虑到这些假设,本文探讨了近年来阻碍保加利亚外商直接投资的具体因素;并评估了保加利亚加入欧盟的影响。我们这样做的信念是,任何国家吸引外国直接投资的倾向都反映了它对指导外部投资决策的规范和价值观的广泛接受。保加利亚与欧盟关系的这一方面在学术界相对被忽视
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of foreign direct investment in Bulgaria
By the end of 2007, two more countries, Bulgaria and Romania, are now confidently expected to become full members of the European Union (EU). This further extension of the Union into southeastern Europe represents a consolidation of the integration process in the region and lays the foundations for future enlargement to, firstly, Croatia, and then the rest of thewestern Balkans. The internal economic and political development of these latter countries is now anchored in the prospect of EUmembership and there is a real sense in which we can observe the ‘political conditionality’ imposed by Brussels acting as a magnet for democratic reform processes in the region. Bulgaria and Romania have acted as rolemodels and the fragility of their reformprocesses offers both an inspiration and a warning to the rest of the region in its bid to integrate itself more closely to the EU. The warning lies in the fact that the Commission can still delay Romanian or Bulgarian accession if the momentum falters or fades, and the inspiration lies in the encouragement and flexibility displayed by Brussels towards these two applicants. Even after they join, much will depend on how their economies and political systems actually adapt to the challenges of the single market. While it may be true that membership will itself solve some of the problems that remain, this cannot be taken for granted. In particular, the competitiveness of these two economies will be rigorously tested as much by other Central and East European member states as by the more well-established but high-cost economies of western Europe. In this context, the ability of Bulgaria and Romania to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) will be the real litmus test of their integration into EU25. The capacity of any economy to absorb FDI reflects a broad spectrum of political and economic attributes: infrastructure, skill levels in the workforce, the banking system, administrative and legal systems, and an atmosphere of political ‘trust’ between donor and recipient countries. Bearing such hypotheses in mind, this paper explores the specific factors that have inhibited FDI in Bulgaria in recent years; and assesses the implications for Bulgarian membership of the EU. We do this in the belief that any country’s propensity to attract FDI is reflective of its broader acceptance of the norms and values that guide externally sourced investment decisions. This aspect of Bulgaria’s relationship with the EU has been relatively neglected in the academic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1