基于强化学习的持续集成测试新案例研究

Fanliang Chen, Zheng Li, Y. Shang, Yang Yang
{"title":"基于强化学习的持续集成测试新案例研究","authors":"Fanliang Chen, Zheng Li, Y. Shang, Yang Yang","doi":"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In software regression testing, newly added test cases are more likely to fail, and therefore, should be prioritized for execution. In software regression testing for continuous integration, reinforcement learning-based approaches are promising and the RETECS (Reinforced Test Case Prioritization and Selection) framework is a successful application case. RETECS uses an agent composed of a neural network to predict the priority of test cases, and the agent needs to learn from historical information to make improvements. However, the newly added test cases have no historical execution information, thus using RETECS to predict their priority is more like ‘random’. In this paper, we focus on new test cases for continuous integration testing, and on the basis of the RETECS framework, we first propose a priority assignment method for new test cases to ensure that they can be executed first. Secondly, continuous integration is a fast iterative integration method where new test cases have strong fault detection capability within the latest periods. Therefore, we further propose an additional reward method for new test cases. Finally, based on the full lifecycle management, the ‘new’ additional rewards need to be terminated within a certain period, and this paper implements an empirical study. We conducted 30 iterations of the experiment on 12 datasets and our best results were 19.24%, 10.67%, and 34.05 positions better compared to the best parameter combination in RETECS for the NAPFD (Normalized Average Percentage of Faults Detected), RECALL and TTF (Test to Fail) metrics, respectively.","PeriodicalId":143812,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focus on New Test Cases in Continuous Integration Testing based on Reinforcement Learning\",\"authors\":\"Fanliang Chen, Zheng Li, Y. Shang, Yang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In software regression testing, newly added test cases are more likely to fail, and therefore, should be prioritized for execution. In software regression testing for continuous integration, reinforcement learning-based approaches are promising and the RETECS (Reinforced Test Case Prioritization and Selection) framework is a successful application case. RETECS uses an agent composed of a neural network to predict the priority of test cases, and the agent needs to learn from historical information to make improvements. However, the newly added test cases have no historical execution information, thus using RETECS to predict their priority is more like ‘random’. In this paper, we focus on new test cases for continuous integration testing, and on the basis of the RETECS framework, we first propose a priority assignment method for new test cases to ensure that they can be executed first. Secondly, continuous integration is a fast iterative integration method where new test cases have strong fault detection capability within the latest periods. Therefore, we further propose an additional reward method for new test cases. Finally, based on the full lifecycle management, the ‘new’ additional rewards need to be terminated within a certain period, and this paper implements an empirical study. We conducted 30 iterations of the experiment on 12 datasets and our best results were 19.24%, 10.67%, and 34.05 positions better compared to the best parameter combination in RETECS for the NAPFD (Normalized Average Percentage of Faults Detected), RECALL and TTF (Test to Fail) metrics, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在软件回归测试中,新添加的测试用例更有可能失败,因此,应该优先执行。在持续集成的软件回归测试中,基于强化学习的方法很有前途,RETECS(强化测试用例优先排序和选择)框架是一个成功的应用案例。RETECS使用一个由神经网络组成的代理来预测测试用例的优先级,并且代理需要从历史信息中学习来进行改进。然而,新添加的测试用例没有历史执行信息,因此使用RETECS来预测它们的优先级更像是“随机的”。在本文中,我们将重点放在持续集成测试的新测试用例上,并在RETECS框架的基础上,我们首先提出了一个新的测试用例的优先级分配方法,以确保它们能够被优先执行。其次,持续集成是一种快速迭代的集成方法,新的测试用例在最近一段时间内具有很强的故障检测能力。因此,我们进一步为新的测试用例提出一个额外的奖励方法。最后,基于全生命周期管理,“新的”额外奖励需要在一定期限内终止,并进行实证研究。我们在12个数据集上进行了30次迭代实验,与RETECS中NAPFD(归一化平均故障检测百分比)、RECALL和TTF(测试失败)指标的最佳参数组合相比,我们的最佳结果分别提高了19.24%、10.67%和34.05个位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Focus on New Test Cases in Continuous Integration Testing based on Reinforcement Learning
In software regression testing, newly added test cases are more likely to fail, and therefore, should be prioritized for execution. In software regression testing for continuous integration, reinforcement learning-based approaches are promising and the RETECS (Reinforced Test Case Prioritization and Selection) framework is a successful application case. RETECS uses an agent composed of a neural network to predict the priority of test cases, and the agent needs to learn from historical information to make improvements. However, the newly added test cases have no historical execution information, thus using RETECS to predict their priority is more like ‘random’. In this paper, we focus on new test cases for continuous integration testing, and on the basis of the RETECS framework, we first propose a priority assignment method for new test cases to ensure that they can be executed first. Secondly, continuous integration is a fast iterative integration method where new test cases have strong fault detection capability within the latest periods. Therefore, we further propose an additional reward method for new test cases. Finally, based on the full lifecycle management, the ‘new’ additional rewards need to be terminated within a certain period, and this paper implements an empirical study. We conducted 30 iterations of the experiment on 12 datasets and our best results were 19.24%, 10.67%, and 34.05 positions better compared to the best parameter combination in RETECS for the NAPFD (Normalized Average Percentage of Faults Detected), RECALL and TTF (Test to Fail) metrics, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuous Usability Requirements Evaluation based on Runtime User Behavior Mining Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Model to Extract Undesired Behaviors from App Reviews An Empirical Study on Source Code Feature Extraction in Preprocessing of IR-Based Requirements Traceability Predictive Mutation Analysis of Test Case Prioritization for Deep Neural Networks Conceptualizing the Secure Machine Learning Operations (SecMLOps) Paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1