同步磁阻电机驱动不同矢量控制方法的性能比较

P. Ghosh, A. Das, G. Bhuvaneswari
{"title":"同步磁阻电机驱动不同矢量控制方法的性能比较","authors":"P. Ghosh, A. Das, G. Bhuvaneswari","doi":"10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comprehensive performance comparison has been made for different vector control methods in Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM). The vector control methods investigated are constant direct axis current control and constant current angle control. Different methods of constant current angle vector control included in this paper are MTPA (Maximum torque per ampere), MPFC (Maximum power factor control) and MTPF (Maximum torque per flux). The SynRM is driven by a current controlled PWM voltage source inverter controlled by a PI speed controller. All these methods have been modelled and simulated in Simulink/MATLAB environment, by keeping the PI controller parameters the same and a thorough comparison has been brought out. A very good performance is achieved for the above mentioned vector control methods and their performance parameters such as response time, torque ripple and peak stator current are being compared. The results obtained from the analysis will help in deciding which of the above vector control techniques can be employed in high performance drive applications such as electric vehicles, ship propulsion, traction, etc., when and under what conditions.","PeriodicalId":286358,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of different vector control approaches for a synchronous reluctance motor drive\",\"authors\":\"P. Ghosh, A. Das, G. Bhuvaneswari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comprehensive performance comparison has been made for different vector control methods in Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM). The vector control methods investigated are constant direct axis current control and constant current angle control. Different methods of constant current angle vector control included in this paper are MTPA (Maximum torque per ampere), MPFC (Maximum power factor control) and MTPF (Maximum torque per flux). The SynRM is driven by a current controlled PWM voltage source inverter controlled by a PI speed controller. All these methods have been modelled and simulated in Simulink/MATLAB environment, by keeping the PI controller parameters the same and a thorough comparison has been brought out. A very good performance is achieved for the above mentioned vector control methods and their performance parameters such as response time, torque ripple and peak stator current are being compared. The results obtained from the analysis will help in deciding which of the above vector control techniques can be employed in high performance drive applications such as electric vehicles, ship propulsion, traction, etc., when and under what conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文对同步磁阻电动机的矢量控制方法进行了全面的性能比较。所研究的矢量控制方法有恒定直轴电流控制和恒定电流角控制。本文介绍的恒流角矢量控制方法有MTPA (Maximum torque per am培)、MPFC (Maximum power factor control)和MTPF (Maximum torque per flux)。SynRM由电流控制的PWM电压源逆变器驱动,由PI速度控制器控制。在保持PI控制器参数不变的情况下,在Simulink/MATLAB环境下对这些方法进行了建模和仿真,并进行了全面的比较。对上述矢量控制方法的响应时间、转矩纹波和定子电流峰值等性能参数进行了比较。从分析中获得的结果将有助于确定哪种上述矢量控制技术可以用于高性能驱动应用,如电动汽车、船舶推进、牵引等,以及何时和在何种条件下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance comparison of different vector control approaches for a synchronous reluctance motor drive
In this paper, a comprehensive performance comparison has been made for different vector control methods in Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM). The vector control methods investigated are constant direct axis current control and constant current angle control. Different methods of constant current angle vector control included in this paper are MTPA (Maximum torque per ampere), MPFC (Maximum power factor control) and MTPF (Maximum torque per flux). The SynRM is driven by a current controlled PWM voltage source inverter controlled by a PI speed controller. All these methods have been modelled and simulated in Simulink/MATLAB environment, by keeping the PI controller parameters the same and a thorough comparison has been brought out. A very good performance is achieved for the above mentioned vector control methods and their performance parameters such as response time, torque ripple and peak stator current are being compared. The results obtained from the analysis will help in deciding which of the above vector control techniques can be employed in high performance drive applications such as electric vehicles, ship propulsion, traction, etc., when and under what conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solar PV fed standalone DC microgrid with hybrid energy storage system Control-oriented parametrized models for microbial fuel cells Wind resource assessment and energy analysis for wind energy projects Per phase power balancing in grid connected cascaded H-bridge multilevel converter for solar PV application Modified soft-switching scheme for charge-pump based IDB converter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1