回答组织转型调查问卷的意外商业案例

Jan van de Poll, Yang Yong, M. Miller
{"title":"回答组织转型调查问卷的意外商业案例","authors":"Jan van de Poll, Yang Yong, M. Miller","doi":"10.24052/jbrmr/v16is02/art-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The input from managers and employees is vital for strategic decision-making. Yet, these people already have enough on their plates if not overwhelmed by their daily to-do lists. We measured how employees in an organizational transformation could save time by stopping to work on non-priorities and stopping to reinvent the wheel by sharing knowledge. First, we designed a new survey scale replacing a Likert survey to ask people for input objectively, reducing interpretation bias. Next, we analyzed survey input from over 32,000 respondents in more than 900 teams in 150 different organization transformations. To free up time, we compared were respondents' planned improvement deviated from their management priorities. To work smarter, we focused on knowledge sharing: how could one employee that already had improved on a specific topic help a colleague that still had to improve? On average, we found a productivity increase of 75 hours, or €2,500.- per respondent. This productivity increase of 75 hours required two things: an average time investment per respondent of max. 15 minutes to answer a questionnaire and an algorithm to indicate 1.) what priorities to focus on and 2.) which colleagues could help with each of these.","PeriodicalId":304986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unexpected business case of answering a questionnaire on organizational transformation\",\"authors\":\"Jan van de Poll, Yang Yong, M. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.24052/jbrmr/v16is02/art-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The input from managers and employees is vital for strategic decision-making. Yet, these people already have enough on their plates if not overwhelmed by their daily to-do lists. We measured how employees in an organizational transformation could save time by stopping to work on non-priorities and stopping to reinvent the wheel by sharing knowledge. First, we designed a new survey scale replacing a Likert survey to ask people for input objectively, reducing interpretation bias. Next, we analyzed survey input from over 32,000 respondents in more than 900 teams in 150 different organization transformations. To free up time, we compared were respondents' planned improvement deviated from their management priorities. To work smarter, we focused on knowledge sharing: how could one employee that already had improved on a specific topic help a colleague that still had to improve? On average, we found a productivity increase of 75 hours, or €2,500.- per respondent. This productivity increase of 75 hours required two things: an average time investment per respondent of max. 15 minutes to answer a questionnaire and an algorithm to indicate 1.) what priorities to focus on and 2.) which colleagues could help with each of these.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v16is02/art-05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v16is02/art-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

管理者和员工的投入对战略决策至关重要。然而,如果这些人没有被他们每天的待办事项清单压垮的话,他们已经有足够的事情要做了。我们衡量了组织转型中的员工如何通过停止非优先事项的工作和停止通过分享知识来重新发明轮子来节省时间。首先,我们设计了一个新的调查量表,以取代李克特调查,客观地要求人们输入,减少解释偏差。接下来,我们分析了来自150个不同组织转型的900多个团队的32,000多名受访者的调查输入。为了节省时间,我们比较了受访者计划的改进是否偏离了他们的管理重点。为了更聪明地工作,我们把重点放在知识共享上:一个在某一特定主题上已经有所进步的员工如何帮助另一个还需要改进的同事?平均而言,我们发现生产率提高了75个小时,即2500欧元。-每个受访者。75小时的生产率提高需要两个条件:每个被调查者的平均时间投入最大值;15分钟的时间来回答一份调查问卷,然后用一种算法来指出:1.)应该关注哪些优先事项;2.)哪些同事可以在这些方面提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The unexpected business case of answering a questionnaire on organizational transformation
The input from managers and employees is vital for strategic decision-making. Yet, these people already have enough on their plates if not overwhelmed by their daily to-do lists. We measured how employees in an organizational transformation could save time by stopping to work on non-priorities and stopping to reinvent the wheel by sharing knowledge. First, we designed a new survey scale replacing a Likert survey to ask people for input objectively, reducing interpretation bias. Next, we analyzed survey input from over 32,000 respondents in more than 900 teams in 150 different organization transformations. To free up time, we compared were respondents' planned improvement deviated from their management priorities. To work smarter, we focused on knowledge sharing: how could one employee that already had improved on a specific topic help a colleague that still had to improve? On average, we found a productivity increase of 75 hours, or €2,500.- per respondent. This productivity increase of 75 hours required two things: an average time investment per respondent of max. 15 minutes to answer a questionnaire and an algorithm to indicate 1.) what priorities to focus on and 2.) which colleagues could help with each of these.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the motives behind festive occasion consumption – An intergenerational perspective The stakeholders’ perspective of the digital transformation phenomenon An investigation of the factors associated with consumer behaviour at arrival, check-in and the check-out process: A case study Marriott International Inc. in the UK Investigating Consumers’ Personal Values that Triggers Luxury Fashion Purchase Intentions: With a Moderating Role of Consumer’s Demographics How does a fashion brand’s customer experience translate in Premium & Luxury retail formats? A parisian retail market outlook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1