{"title":"最小基数集覆盖问题的混合启发式算法","authors":"Francis J. Vasko, G. Wilson","doi":"10.1002/NAV.3800330207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimum cardinality set covering problems (MCSCP) tend to be more difficult to solve than weighted set covering problems because the cost or weight associated with each variable is the same. Since MCSCP is NP-complete, large problem instances are commonly solved using some form of a greedy heuristic. In this paper hybrid algorithms are developed and tested against two common forms of the greedy heuristic. Although all the algorithms tested have the same worst case bounds provided by Ho [7], empirical results for 60 large randomly generated problems indicate that one algorithm performed better than the others.","PeriodicalId":431817,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics Quarterly","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid heuristics for minimum cardinality set covering problems\",\"authors\":\"Francis J. Vasko, G. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/NAV.3800330207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Minimum cardinality set covering problems (MCSCP) tend to be more difficult to solve than weighted set covering problems because the cost or weight associated with each variable is the same. Since MCSCP is NP-complete, large problem instances are commonly solved using some form of a greedy heuristic. In this paper hybrid algorithms are developed and tested against two common forms of the greedy heuristic. Although all the algorithms tested have the same worst case bounds provided by Ho [7], empirical results for 60 large randomly generated problems indicate that one algorithm performed better than the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naval Research Logistics Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naval Research Logistics Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/NAV.3800330207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/NAV.3800330207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hybrid heuristics for minimum cardinality set covering problems
Minimum cardinality set covering problems (MCSCP) tend to be more difficult to solve than weighted set covering problems because the cost or weight associated with each variable is the same. Since MCSCP is NP-complete, large problem instances are commonly solved using some form of a greedy heuristic. In this paper hybrid algorithms are developed and tested against two common forms of the greedy heuristic. Although all the algorithms tested have the same worst case bounds provided by Ho [7], empirical results for 60 large randomly generated problems indicate that one algorithm performed better than the others.