条件简单时态网络动态一致性检验中的瞬时反应时间

Massimo Cairo, Carlo Comin, Romeo Rizzi
{"title":"条件简单时态网络动态一致性检验中的瞬时反应时间","authors":"Massimo Cairo, Carlo Comin, Romeo Rizzi","doi":"10.1109/TIME.2016.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.","PeriodicalId":347020,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instantaneous Reaction-Time in Dynamic-Consistency Checking of Conditional Simple Temporal Networks\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Cairo, Carlo Comin, Romeo Rizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIME.2016.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2016.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2016.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

条件简单时态网络(CSTN)是一种基于约束的条件时态规划图形式。对于cstn和cstp,出现了三种一致性概念:弱、强和动态。动态一致性(DC)是最有趣的概念,但也是最具挑战性的概念。为了解决DC- checking问题,在[Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015]中,我们引入了ε-DC(一种更精确、更现实的DC概念),并提供了一种算法解决方案。其次,假设对于足够小的ε > 0, DC意味着ε-DC,并且对于每一个ε > 0, ε-DC意味着DC,我们对反应时间ε的临界值给出了一个锐利的下限分析,在这个临界值下,两个概念重合。这为cstn的dc检查提供了第一个(伪)单指数时间算法。然而,ε- dc概念本身就很有趣,[Comin和Rizzi, TIME 2015]中的ε- dc - checking算法基于反应时间满足ε >的假设,没有解决ε = 0时会发生什么的问题。在这项工作中,我们引入并研究了π-DC,一个具有瞬时反应时间(即计划者可以在观察的同一时刻对任何观察做出反应)的DC的合理概念。首先,我们通过反例证明π-DC不等于0-DC,并且0-DC实际上不足以模拟具有瞬时反应时间的直流。这表明,在我们以前的工作中得到的主要结果并不直接适用于ε = 0的情况。受此启发,作为第二项贡献,我们扩展了之前的工具来处理π-DC,引入了ps树的概念,并指出π-DC与HyTN-Consistency之间的关系。第三,将π-DC-Checking简化为DC-Checking。这使我们能够设计和分析第一个完整的π- dc校验程序。值得注意的是,该算法的时间复杂度在命题字母的数量上保持(伪)单指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Instantaneous Reaction-Time in Dynamic-Consistency Checking of Conditional Simple Temporal Networks
Conditional Simple Temporal Network CSTN is a constraint-based graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. Three notions of consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic-Consistency (DC) is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging. In order to address the DC-Checking problem, in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] we introduced ε-DC (a refined, more realistic, notion of DC), and provided an algorithmic solution to it. Next, given that DC implies ε-DC for some sufficiently small ε > 0, and that for every ε > 0 it holds that ε-DC implies DC, we offered a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction-time ε under which the two notions coincide. This delivered the first (pseudo) singly-exponential time algorithm for the DC-Checking of CSTNs. However, the ε-DC notion is interesting per se, and the ε-DC-Checking algorithm in [Comin and Rizzi, TIME 2015] rests on the assumption that the reaction-time satisfies ε > 0, leaving unsolved the question of what happens when ε = 0. In this work, we introduce and study π-DC, a sound notion of DC with an instantaneous reaction-time (i.e. one in which the planner can react to any observation at the same instant of time in which the observation is made). Firstly, we demonstrate by a counter-example that π-DC is not equivalent to 0-DC, and that 0-DC is actually inadequate for modeling DC with an instantaneous reaction-time. This shows that the main results obtained in our previous work do not apply directly, as they were formulated, to the case of ε = 0. Motivated by this observation, as a second contribution, our previous tools are extended in order to handle π-DC, and the notion of ps-tree is introduced, also pointing out a relationship between π-DC and HyTN-Consistency. Thirdly, a simple reduction from π-DC-Checking to DC-Checking is identified. This allows us to design and to analyze the first sound-and-complete π-DC-Checking procedure. Remarkably, the time complexity of the proposed algorithm remains (pseudo) singly-exponential in the number of propositional letters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symbolic Simulation of Parametrized Hybrid Systems with Affine Arithmetic Modelling Systems over General Linear Time Automatic Verification, Performance Analysis, Synthesis and Optimization of Timed Systems Timelines Are Expressive Enough to Capture Action-Based Temporal Planning Optimal Control for Simple Linear Hybrid Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1