柔性制造系统备选方案评价的模糊MCDM方法

E. Karsak
{"title":"柔性制造系统备选方案评价的模糊MCDM方法","authors":"E. Karsak","doi":"10.1109/EMS.2000.872483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the high required capital outlay and moderate risk of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS) investment, economic justification techniques are insufficient by themselves since they cannot cope with the benefits such as flexibility and enhanced quality offered by advanced manufacturing technologies. A robust decision making procedure for selection of flexible manufacturing systems requires the consideration of both economic and strategic investment measures. In this paper, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework based on the concepts of ideal and negative-ideal solutions is presented for the selection of an FMS from a set of mutually exclusive alternatives. The proposed method provides the means for incorporating the economic figure of merit as well as the strategic performance variables. Initially, the selection criteria and their importance weights are determined. Linguistic variables are used to indicate the importance weight of each criterion. Then, the decision matrix containing the criteria values for the FMS alternatives is normalized to obtain unit-free elements. Afterwards, the weighted normalized decision matrix is obtained by taking the importance weight of each criterion into consideration. The ideal solution and the negative-ideal solution are determined by ranking the weighted normalized values for each criterion. Next, the distance between each FMS alternative, and the ideal and negative-ideal solutions are computed. Finally, the ranking order of the FMS alternatives is obtained based on their relative proximity to the ideal solution.","PeriodicalId":440516,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy MCDM procedure for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives\",\"authors\":\"E. Karsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMS.2000.872483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considering the high required capital outlay and moderate risk of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS) investment, economic justification techniques are insufficient by themselves since they cannot cope with the benefits such as flexibility and enhanced quality offered by advanced manufacturing technologies. A robust decision making procedure for selection of flexible manufacturing systems requires the consideration of both economic and strategic investment measures. In this paper, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework based on the concepts of ideal and negative-ideal solutions is presented for the selection of an FMS from a set of mutually exclusive alternatives. The proposed method provides the means for incorporating the economic figure of merit as well as the strategic performance variables. Initially, the selection criteria and their importance weights are determined. Linguistic variables are used to indicate the importance weight of each criterion. Then, the decision matrix containing the criteria values for the FMS alternatives is normalized to obtain unit-free elements. Afterwards, the weighted normalized decision matrix is obtained by taking the importance weight of each criterion into consideration. The ideal solution and the negative-ideal solution are determined by ranking the weighted normalized values for each criterion. Next, the distance between each FMS alternative, and the ideal and negative-ideal solutions are computed. Finally, the ranking order of the FMS alternatives is obtained based on their relative proximity to the ideal solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2000.872483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2000.872483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

考虑到柔性制造系统(FMS)投资所需的高资本支出和中等风险,经济论证技术本身是不够的,因为它们无法应对先进制造技术提供的灵活性和提高质量等好处。柔性制造系统选择的稳健决策程序需要考虑经济和战略投资措施。本文提出了一种基于理想解和负理想解概念的模糊多准则决策框架,用于从一组互斥的备选方案中选择一个FMS。所提出的方法提供了将经济价值数字和战略绩效变量结合起来的手段。首先,确定选择标准及其重要性权重。语言变量用于表示每个标准的重要性权重。然后,将包含FMS备选方案准则值的决策矩阵归一化,得到无单元元素。然后,考虑各准则的重要度,得到加权归一化决策矩阵。通过对各准则的加权归一化值进行排序,确定理想解和负理想解。然后,计算每个FMS备选方案与理想解和负理想解之间的距离。最后,根据FMS方案与理想解的相对接近度,给出了FMS方案的排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fuzzy MCDM procedure for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives
Considering the high required capital outlay and moderate risk of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS) investment, economic justification techniques are insufficient by themselves since they cannot cope with the benefits such as flexibility and enhanced quality offered by advanced manufacturing technologies. A robust decision making procedure for selection of flexible manufacturing systems requires the consideration of both economic and strategic investment measures. In this paper, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework based on the concepts of ideal and negative-ideal solutions is presented for the selection of an FMS from a set of mutually exclusive alternatives. The proposed method provides the means for incorporating the economic figure of merit as well as the strategic performance variables. Initially, the selection criteria and their importance weights are determined. Linguistic variables are used to indicate the importance weight of each criterion. Then, the decision matrix containing the criteria values for the FMS alternatives is normalized to obtain unit-free elements. Afterwards, the weighted normalized decision matrix is obtained by taking the importance weight of each criterion into consideration. The ideal solution and the negative-ideal solution are determined by ranking the weighted normalized values for each criterion. Next, the distance between each FMS alternative, and the ideal and negative-ideal solutions are computed. Finally, the ranking order of the FMS alternatives is obtained based on their relative proximity to the ideal solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology transfer in a complex environment: exploring key relationships The nature of the 21st century paradigm shift driven by the next-generation Internet Knowledge management in the professional services: lessons from functional linguistics Preventing escalation of commitment to dysfunctional marketing relationships: The unique case of customers Emergence of a new industrial paradigm: ICT supported customer service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1