{"title":"正确的无功功率测量早就该实施了","authors":"Tan Zhang, S. Cialdea, A. Emanuel, J. Orr","doi":"10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope of this study is two fold: first, it advocates the recognition of the 60/50 Hz, positive-sequence reactive power as the significant reactive power component of apparent power. This nonactive component must be monitored in the same way that the 60/50 Hz active power is monitored under nonsinusoidal conditions. Secondly, this paper documents the fact that instrumentation used today for reactive power measurement is marred by a significant difference between the indicated reactive power and the correct 60/50 Hz reactive power. Regrettably, such instrumentation is still favored by many utilities, instrumentation manufacturers and supervisors of energy markets. This paper documents a wide spectrum of situations that shed light on the discrepancies between the correct value of the reactive power and the measured value.","PeriodicalId":188461,"journal":{"name":"2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of correct reactive power measurement is long overdue\",\"authors\":\"Tan Zhang, S. Cialdea, A. Emanuel, J. Orr\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scope of this study is two fold: first, it advocates the recognition of the 60/50 Hz, positive-sequence reactive power as the significant reactive power component of apparent power. This nonactive component must be monitored in the same way that the 60/50 Hz active power is monitored under nonsinusoidal conditions. Secondly, this paper documents the fact that instrumentation used today for reactive power measurement is marred by a significant difference between the indicated reactive power and the correct 60/50 Hz reactive power. Regrettably, such instrumentation is still favored by many utilities, instrumentation manufacturers and supervisors of energy markets. This paper documents a wide spectrum of situations that shed light on the discrepancies between the correct value of the reactive power and the measured value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The implementation of correct reactive power measurement is long overdue
The scope of this study is two fold: first, it advocates the recognition of the 60/50 Hz, positive-sequence reactive power as the significant reactive power component of apparent power. This nonactive component must be monitored in the same way that the 60/50 Hz active power is monitored under nonsinusoidal conditions. Secondly, this paper documents the fact that instrumentation used today for reactive power measurement is marred by a significant difference between the indicated reactive power and the correct 60/50 Hz reactive power. Regrettably, such instrumentation is still favored by many utilities, instrumentation manufacturers and supervisors of energy markets. This paper documents a wide spectrum of situations that shed light on the discrepancies between the correct value of the reactive power and the measured value.