Halomoan Halomoan, Faizal Mahmoud Adam Ibrahim, Uril Bahruddin
{"title":"Taḥlῑl Ikhtibār Kafā`ah al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah li an-Nāṭiqῑna bigairihā fī Jāmi’ah Sulṭān Syarῑf Qāsim al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Riau","authors":"Halomoan Halomoan, Faizal Mahmoud Adam Ibrahim, Uril Bahruddin","doi":"10.18326/lisania.v6i1.74-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the items quality of the Test of Arabic as a Foreign Language (TOAFL) conducted at Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University (UIN) Riau, including the questions’ validity and reliability, difficulty level, and discriminating power. It used the descriptive quantitative method. The data were collected by tests and documentation, and then analyzed using SPSS 25. Regarding question validity, it was found that 35 items (25%) were valid, and 105 (75%) items were invalid. Meanwhile, the reliability score was 0.856. while judging from the level of difficulty, it was found that the easy category included 40 items (28.57%), the medium category included 56 questions (40%), and the difficult category included 44 questions (31.43%). In terms of discriminating power, 36 questions (25,71% were in the excellent category, 21 questions (15%) were good, and 83 questions (59,29%) were considered in the bad category.","PeriodicalId":347220,"journal":{"name":"LISANIA: Journal of Arabic Education and Literature","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LISANIA: Journal of Arabic Education and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/lisania.v6i1.74-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了廖内州苏丹·沙里夫·卡西姆州立伊斯兰大学(UIN)进行的阿拉伯语作为外语测试(TOAFL)的项目质量,包括问题的效度和信度,难度水平和辨析能力。采用描述性定量方法。通过测试和文档收集数据,然后使用SPSS 25进行分析。在问题效度方面,有效题项35项(25%),无效题项105项(75%)。同时,信度得分为0.856。从难易程度来看,简单类试题40题(28.57%),中等类试题56题(40%),难易类试题44题(31.43%)。在判别能力方面,36个问题(25.71%)被认为是优秀的,21个问题(15%)被认为是好的,83个问题(59.29%)被认为是不好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taḥlῑl Ikhtibār Kafā`ah al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah li an-Nāṭiqῑna bigairihā fī Jāmi’ah Sulṭān Syarῑf Qāsim al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Riau
This study assessed the items quality of the Test of Arabic as a Foreign Language (TOAFL) conducted at Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University (UIN) Riau, including the questions’ validity and reliability, difficulty level, and discriminating power. It used the descriptive quantitative method. The data were collected by tests and documentation, and then analyzed using SPSS 25. Regarding question validity, it was found that 35 items (25%) were valid, and 105 (75%) items were invalid. Meanwhile, the reliability score was 0.856. while judging from the level of difficulty, it was found that the easy category included 40 items (28.57%), the medium category included 56 questions (40%), and the difficult category included 44 questions (31.43%). In terms of discriminating power, 36 questions (25,71% were in the excellent category, 21 questions (15%) were good, and 83 questions (59,29%) were considered in the bad category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taṭwῑr Mawād Ta’lῑm Mahārah al-Kalām li as-Siyāḥah fῑ ḍau` al-Ma’āyir al-Waṭaniyyah li al-Kafā`ah al-Mihniyyah Gazal al-Auṭān wa al-Buldān fῑ Syi’r Māni’ Sa’ῑd al-‘Utaibah Fa’āliyah Namūżaj Taqwῑm at-Tanāquḍ fῑ Taḥsῑn Jaudah Ta’lῑm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah The Effectiveness of Mufradat Cards in Arabic Learning Outcomes in Thematic Learning in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Intention and Motivation in Online Arabic Courses: Agency for Learning Phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1