《次等人》会推特吗?对Twitter作为表象空间和获取可见性不平等的反思

T. Trillò
{"title":"《次等人》会推特吗?对Twitter作为表象空间和获取可见性不平等的反思","authors":"T. Trillò","doi":"10.1080/09737189.2017.1420404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Defining contemporary social movements as ‘Twitter revolutions’ has become increasingly common. A wide array of studies, however, suggest that social media and political participation have a complex relationship that cannot be reduced to easily intelligible causal links. Based on Gerbaudo’s choreography of assembly and Butler’s performative theory of assembly, this paper will firstly explore the case in favor of an understanding of Twitter as a place where people can perform their political claims and enact resistance. Based on Fuchs’ asymmetrical political attention economy of capitalism, this paper will then put forward the argument that inequality in access to visibility substantially hinders Twitter’s potential as a space for political engagement. Based on this framework, this paper will finally offer a short review of two recent cases of Twitter activism, and namely the Ni Una Menos feminist movement in Argentina and the Rhodes Must Fall/Fees Must Fall student movement in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":415880,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Home and Community Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can The Subaltern Tweet? Reflections on Twitter as a Space of Appearance and Inequality in Accessing Visibility\",\"authors\":\"T. Trillò\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09737189.2017.1420404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Defining contemporary social movements as ‘Twitter revolutions’ has become increasingly common. A wide array of studies, however, suggest that social media and political participation have a complex relationship that cannot be reduced to easily intelligible causal links. Based on Gerbaudo’s choreography of assembly and Butler’s performative theory of assembly, this paper will firstly explore the case in favor of an understanding of Twitter as a place where people can perform their political claims and enact resistance. Based on Fuchs’ asymmetrical political attention economy of capitalism, this paper will then put forward the argument that inequality in access to visibility substantially hinders Twitter’s potential as a space for political engagement. Based on this framework, this paper will finally offer a short review of two recent cases of Twitter activism, and namely the Ni Una Menos feminist movement in Argentina and the Rhodes Must Fall/Fees Must Fall student movement in South Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies on Home and Community Science\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies on Home and Community Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2017.1420404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Home and Community Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2017.1420404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

将当代社会运动定义为“推特革命”已经变得越来越普遍。然而,大量的研究表明,社交媒体和政治参与有着复杂的关系,不能简化为容易理解的因果关系。基于Gerbaudo的集会编排和Butler的集会表演理论,本文将首先探讨Twitter作为人们可以执行其政治主张和制定抵抗的地方的案例。基于Fuchs的资本主义的不对称政治注意力经济,本文将提出这样的论点:获得可见性的不平等实质上阻碍了Twitter作为政治参与空间的潜力。基于这个框架,本文最后将简要回顾最近的两个Twitter激进主义案例,即阿根廷的Ni Una Menos女权运动和南非的Rhodes Must Fall/Fees Must Fall学生运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can The Subaltern Tweet? Reflections on Twitter as a Space of Appearance and Inequality in Accessing Visibility
ABSTRACT Defining contemporary social movements as ‘Twitter revolutions’ has become increasingly common. A wide array of studies, however, suggest that social media and political participation have a complex relationship that cannot be reduced to easily intelligible causal links. Based on Gerbaudo’s choreography of assembly and Butler’s performative theory of assembly, this paper will firstly explore the case in favor of an understanding of Twitter as a place where people can perform their political claims and enact resistance. Based on Fuchs’ asymmetrical political attention economy of capitalism, this paper will then put forward the argument that inequality in access to visibility substantially hinders Twitter’s potential as a space for political engagement. Based on this framework, this paper will finally offer a short review of two recent cases of Twitter activism, and namely the Ni Una Menos feminist movement in Argentina and the Rhodes Must Fall/Fees Must Fall student movement in South Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capacity Building through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) for Teacher Education Programmes in India Participation and Decision Making Pattern of Rural Women in Agricultural Activities in Mansa District of Punjab A Case Study of Level and Variation in the Knowledge about Healthy Diet among Homemakers Cognitive Styles, Study Habits and Academic Achievement of Students of Central University of Kashmir Clothing Practices of Tribal Women of Udaipur Sub-area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1