国家、跨国和欧洲法律史:问题和范式。苏格兰人的视角

Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ? Pub Date : 2021-07-23 DOI:10.35562/cliothemis.1717

J. Cairns

{"title":"国家、跨国和欧洲法律史:问题和范式。苏格兰人的视角","authors":"J. Cairns","doi":"10.35562/cliothemis.1717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the different ways of writing legal history, using concrete examples to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of each. The possibilities of national, European and transnational legal histories are discussed, with a conclusion that most good legal history has always had a comparative or transnational aspect.","PeriodicalId":405127,"journal":{"name":"Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ?","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National, Transnational and European Legal Histories: Problems and Paradigms. A Scottish perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. Cairns\",\"doi\":\"10.35562/cliothemis.1717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the different ways of writing legal history, using concrete examples to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of each. The possibilities of national, European and transnational legal histories are discussed, with a conclusion that most good legal history has always had a comparative or transnational aspect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ?\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35562/cliothemis.1717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35562/cliothemis.1717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了撰写法律史的不同方法，并以具体的例子来说明每种方法的优缺点。讨论了国家、欧洲和跨国法律史的可能性，并得出结论，大多数好的法律史总是具有比较或跨国的方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

National, Transnational and European Legal Histories: Problems and Paradigms. A Scottish perspective

This article explores the different ways of writing legal history, using concrete examples to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of each. The possibilities of national, European and transnational legal histories are discussed, with a conclusion that most good legal history has always had a comparative or transnational aspect.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Écrire l’histoire du droit : rompre avec les schémas nationaux ?

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Richard Hyland, « BABEL : Un She’ur » (1990) National, Transnational and European Legal Histories: Problems and Paradigms. A Scottish perspective Ouverture. Dénationaliser l’histoire du droit ? Les modes alternatifs de résolution des conflits Quelle critique pour l’enseignement du droit ?