轨迹:绘制根茎

Michael Y. Bennett
{"title":"轨迹:绘制根茎","authors":"Michael Y. Bennett","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maps ... are superimposed in such a way that each map finds itself modified in the following map, rather than finding its origin in the preceding one: from one map to the next, it is not a matter of searching for an origin, but of evaluating displacements. Every map is a redistribution of impasses and breakthroughs, of thresholds and enclosures, which necessarily go from bottom to top. There is not only a reversal of directions, but also a difference in nature: the unconscious no longer deals with persons and objects, but with trajectories and becomings.... --Gilles Deleuze (1) Disclaimer experiment, n. The action of trying anything, or putting it to proof; a test, trial; (2) the following article. The beautiful thing about the hard sciences (e.g., chemistry, physic, etc., and I mean no disrespect to those fields that fall outside of the common designation \"hard sciences\"), is the experiment. Or rather, more wonderful than even the experiment is the inherent acknowledgement that the scientist begins with only a hypothesis and that the evidence gathered sculpts the hopefully-publishable paper. The scientist cares not what path the evidence takes him or her, or whether or not his or her hypothesis was right in the first place. A successful scientist gets paid to evaluate the differences in his or her findings with the scientist's hypothesis. Scientists must reconcile each turn within a rhizome. This is the Scientific Method, the dominant form of scientific inquiry for five hundred or so years. This paper is an experiment testing a two-fold hypothesis. The two hypotheses are as follows: 1) a modified Scientific Method can be used effectively to conduct research in the field of English Literature, Critical Theory (Cultural Studies) and Human Sciences (as well as, I presume, every other social science) 2) this paper, which is an inquiry on maps will, in fact, function as a map. The two hypotheses may, however, be in fact one. A paper which acts like a Deleuzean map has similar properties to that of the Scientific Method: observation, hypothesis, experiment, conclusion. I, however, do not want to spend my time on this paper trying to employ the strict Scientific Method or trying to show similarities to it. I invoke the Scientific Method for the possibility it presents. Basically every paper in the field of English Literature has an observation, hypothesis (thesis), experiment (evidence) and a conclusion (they already resemble the Scientific Method). But how often does the writer prove his or her hypothesis incorrect? Never (or at least I have never encountered this). My aim in this paper is to 'experiment' with a new method of inquiry. This inquiry works like a Deleuzean map. Method of Inquiry I will describe this paper as a series of displacements. I am beginning the paper with the above quote from \"What Children Say.\" This is the observation (or Deleuze's observation). I will then hypothesize about this quote. It is the experiment that will seem extraordinary. Each piece of new evidence will take the paper in a different direction. After each piece of evidence is introduced, it will be my job to draw conclusions about the displacement. This conclusion is only meant to be a conclusion to one part of the whole rhizome (whose nature is infinite). Let me put it more simply, I am following one possible path this paper could take. This will be only one of the many possible papers produced. This paper may be continued ad infinitum, either from the 'end' of this paper, or from any point within it. I hope this will give you some idea as to how this paper will work, but I hesitate to explain any more, for I want to leave the possibilities as open as humanly possible. A becoming-rhizome is what is desired for this paper. Mapping Maps To begin this first section, I hesitate to copy the exact same quote that this paper started with, but I feel as though, even though these are the exact same words, when superimposed on the first, they will have a different ring to it because of the displacement that occurred from the start of the paper to this point: Maps . …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"9 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories: Mapping Rhizomes\",\"authors\":\"Michael Y. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maps ... are superimposed in such a way that each map finds itself modified in the following map, rather than finding its origin in the preceding one: from one map to the next, it is not a matter of searching for an origin, but of evaluating displacements. Every map is a redistribution of impasses and breakthroughs, of thresholds and enclosures, which necessarily go from bottom to top. There is not only a reversal of directions, but also a difference in nature: the unconscious no longer deals with persons and objects, but with trajectories and becomings.... --Gilles Deleuze (1) Disclaimer experiment, n. The action of trying anything, or putting it to proof; a test, trial; (2) the following article. The beautiful thing about the hard sciences (e.g., chemistry, physic, etc., and I mean no disrespect to those fields that fall outside of the common designation \\\"hard sciences\\\"), is the experiment. Or rather, more wonderful than even the experiment is the inherent acknowledgement that the scientist begins with only a hypothesis and that the evidence gathered sculpts the hopefully-publishable paper. The scientist cares not what path the evidence takes him or her, or whether or not his or her hypothesis was right in the first place. A successful scientist gets paid to evaluate the differences in his or her findings with the scientist's hypothesis. Scientists must reconcile each turn within a rhizome. This is the Scientific Method, the dominant form of scientific inquiry for five hundred or so years. This paper is an experiment testing a two-fold hypothesis. The two hypotheses are as follows: 1) a modified Scientific Method can be used effectively to conduct research in the field of English Literature, Critical Theory (Cultural Studies) and Human Sciences (as well as, I presume, every other social science) 2) this paper, which is an inquiry on maps will, in fact, function as a map. The two hypotheses may, however, be in fact one. A paper which acts like a Deleuzean map has similar properties to that of the Scientific Method: observation, hypothesis, experiment, conclusion. I, however, do not want to spend my time on this paper trying to employ the strict Scientific Method or trying to show similarities to it. I invoke the Scientific Method for the possibility it presents. Basically every paper in the field of English Literature has an observation, hypothesis (thesis), experiment (evidence) and a conclusion (they already resemble the Scientific Method). But how often does the writer prove his or her hypothesis incorrect? Never (or at least I have never encountered this). My aim in this paper is to 'experiment' with a new method of inquiry. This inquiry works like a Deleuzean map. Method of Inquiry I will describe this paper as a series of displacements. I am beginning the paper with the above quote from \\\"What Children Say.\\\" This is the observation (or Deleuze's observation). I will then hypothesize about this quote. It is the experiment that will seem extraordinary. Each piece of new evidence will take the paper in a different direction. After each piece of evidence is introduced, it will be my job to draw conclusions about the displacement. This conclusion is only meant to be a conclusion to one part of the whole rhizome (whose nature is infinite). Let me put it more simply, I am following one possible path this paper could take. This will be only one of the many possible papers produced. This paper may be continued ad infinitum, either from the 'end' of this paper, or from any point within it. I hope this will give you some idea as to how this paper will work, but I hesitate to explain any more, for I want to leave the possibilities as open as humanly possible. A becoming-rhizome is what is desired for this paper. Mapping Maps To begin this first section, I hesitate to copy the exact same quote that this paper started with, but I feel as though, even though these are the exact same words, when superimposed on the first, they will have a different ring to it because of the displacement that occurred from the start of the paper to this point: Maps . …\",\"PeriodicalId\":288505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"9 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地图……以这样一种方式叠加,即每个地图发现自己在下一个地图中被修改,而不是在前一个地图中找到它的原点:从一张地图到下一张地图,这不是寻找原点的问题,而是评估位移的问题。每张地图都是对僵局和突破、门槛和边界的重新分配,必然是从下到上。这不仅是方向的逆转,也是本质的不同:无意识不再处理人和物体,而是处理轨迹和变成....免责实验(免责实验),名词。尝试任何事物或对其进行验证的行为;一试,试;(2)下列条款。硬科学(如化学、物理等,我无意冒犯那些不被称为“硬科学”的领域)的美妙之处在于实验。或者更确切地说,比实验更美妙的是,科学家从一个假设开始,收集的证据塑造了有望发表的论文。科学家并不关心证据将他或她带向何方,也不关心他或她的假设一开始是否正确。一个成功的科学家得到报酬是评估他或她的发现与科学家的假设之间的差异。科学家必须协调根茎内部的每一次转动。这就是科学方法,五百年来科学探究的主导形式。本文是一个检验双重假设的实验。这两个假设是:1)修改后的科学方法可以有效地用于英国文学、批判理论(文化研究)和人文科学(以及,我认为,其他所有社会科学)领域的研究。2)这篇论文,这是一篇关于地图的探究,实际上将起到地图的作用。然而,这两种假设实际上可能是同一种。一篇论文就像一张德勒兹的地图,它与科学方法有着相似的性质:观察、假设、实验、结论。然而,我不想把时间花在这篇论文上,试图采用严格的科学方法或试图展示与之相似的地方。我援引科学方法是因为它提供了可能性。基本上,英国文学领域的每一篇论文都有观察、假设(论文)、实验(证据)和结论(它们已经类似于科学方法)。但是作者多久证明一次他或她的假设是错误的呢?从来没有(或者至少我从未遇到过这种情况)。我在这篇论文中的目的是“试验”一种新的探究方法。这种调查就像德勒兹的地图。我将把这篇论文描述为一系列的置换。我在这篇文章的开头引用了《孩子们说什么》中的一段话。这就是观察(或德勒兹的观察)然后我将对这句话进行假设。这个实验将会显得非同寻常。每一个新的证据都将把这篇论文带向不同的方向。在每一个证据被介绍之后,我的工作就是得出关于位移的结论。这个结论只意味着对整个根茎的一部分(其性质是无限的)的结论。让我更简单地说,我正在走这篇文章可能走的一条路。这只是可能发表的众多论文中的一篇。这篇论文可以无限地延续下去,要么从这篇论文的“结尾”开始,要么从它的任何一点开始。我希望这将给你一些关于这篇论文将如何工作的想法,但我不愿意再解释了,因为我想让可能性尽可能地开放。这篇论文所需要的是一个正在形成的根茎。在第一部分的开头,我犹豫了一下是否要复制这篇论文开头的那句话,但我觉得,即使这是完全相同的词,当它们叠加在第一个词上时,它们会有不同的感觉,因为从论文的开头到这一点发生了位移:地图。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trajectories: Mapping Rhizomes
Maps ... are superimposed in such a way that each map finds itself modified in the following map, rather than finding its origin in the preceding one: from one map to the next, it is not a matter of searching for an origin, but of evaluating displacements. Every map is a redistribution of impasses and breakthroughs, of thresholds and enclosures, which necessarily go from bottom to top. There is not only a reversal of directions, but also a difference in nature: the unconscious no longer deals with persons and objects, but with trajectories and becomings.... --Gilles Deleuze (1) Disclaimer experiment, n. The action of trying anything, or putting it to proof; a test, trial; (2) the following article. The beautiful thing about the hard sciences (e.g., chemistry, physic, etc., and I mean no disrespect to those fields that fall outside of the common designation "hard sciences"), is the experiment. Or rather, more wonderful than even the experiment is the inherent acknowledgement that the scientist begins with only a hypothesis and that the evidence gathered sculpts the hopefully-publishable paper. The scientist cares not what path the evidence takes him or her, or whether or not his or her hypothesis was right in the first place. A successful scientist gets paid to evaluate the differences in his or her findings with the scientist's hypothesis. Scientists must reconcile each turn within a rhizome. This is the Scientific Method, the dominant form of scientific inquiry for five hundred or so years. This paper is an experiment testing a two-fold hypothesis. The two hypotheses are as follows: 1) a modified Scientific Method can be used effectively to conduct research in the field of English Literature, Critical Theory (Cultural Studies) and Human Sciences (as well as, I presume, every other social science) 2) this paper, which is an inquiry on maps will, in fact, function as a map. The two hypotheses may, however, be in fact one. A paper which acts like a Deleuzean map has similar properties to that of the Scientific Method: observation, hypothesis, experiment, conclusion. I, however, do not want to spend my time on this paper trying to employ the strict Scientific Method or trying to show similarities to it. I invoke the Scientific Method for the possibility it presents. Basically every paper in the field of English Literature has an observation, hypothesis (thesis), experiment (evidence) and a conclusion (they already resemble the Scientific Method). But how often does the writer prove his or her hypothesis incorrect? Never (or at least I have never encountered this). My aim in this paper is to 'experiment' with a new method of inquiry. This inquiry works like a Deleuzean map. Method of Inquiry I will describe this paper as a series of displacements. I am beginning the paper with the above quote from "What Children Say." This is the observation (or Deleuze's observation). I will then hypothesize about this quote. It is the experiment that will seem extraordinary. Each piece of new evidence will take the paper in a different direction. After each piece of evidence is introduced, it will be my job to draw conclusions about the displacement. This conclusion is only meant to be a conclusion to one part of the whole rhizome (whose nature is infinite). Let me put it more simply, I am following one possible path this paper could take. This will be only one of the many possible papers produced. This paper may be continued ad infinitum, either from the 'end' of this paper, or from any point within it. I hope this will give you some idea as to how this paper will work, but I hesitate to explain any more, for I want to leave the possibilities as open as humanly possible. A becoming-rhizome is what is desired for this paper. Mapping Maps To begin this first section, I hesitate to copy the exact same quote that this paper started with, but I feel as though, even though these are the exact same words, when superimposed on the first, they will have a different ring to it because of the displacement that occurred from the start of the paper to this point: Maps . …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1