根据巴西ISO/IEC 17025进行不合格分析

Morgana Pizzolato, Filipe Medeiros Albano
{"title":"根据巴西ISO/IEC 17025进行不合格分析","authors":"Morgana Pizzolato, Filipe Medeiros Albano","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the analysis of nonconformities found in auditing of testing and calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025. This International Standard specifies the general requirements for the competence to carry out tests and/or calibrations. It covers testing and calibration performed using standard methods, non-standard methods, and laboratory-developed methods. The auditing was conducted by auditors from Rede Metrológica RS (RMRS). The RMRS is a nonprofit association of technical and scientific nature that acts as an articulator in metrology and quality in Brazil. The main objective of this research was to identify the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements that have a higher number of non-conformities. We collected data on laboratory auditing performed in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 years that represent about 500 laboratories audits. The data analyses were conducted clustering the laboratories by calibration and test area, by ISO/IEC 17025 requirements and by year. The areas of calibration laboratories were: acoustic; length, electricity, force, torque and hardness, mass, optical, pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity, time and frequency, viscosity, volume. The areas of testing laboratories were: chemistry and physical chemistry, microbiological, biological and toxicological, mechanical and biochemistry. In the analysis were considered separately the percentages of non-conformities in technical and management requirements and also joint. Among the technical requirements with the highest number of non-conformities are Test and calibration methods and method validation (5.4) and Measurement traceability (5.6). Among the management requirements are Document control (4.3) and Control of records (4.13). Was also possible to identify which area of calibration or test showed a higher number of non-conformities. The calibration areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity and length. The testing areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were chemistry and physical chemistry and microbiological. Finally, one can see the trend of nonconformities in assessments of laboratories in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements using the result of five years.","PeriodicalId":445779,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonconformities Analysis According to ISO/IEC 17025 in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Morgana Pizzolato, Filipe Medeiros Albano\",\"doi\":\"10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the analysis of nonconformities found in auditing of testing and calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025. This International Standard specifies the general requirements for the competence to carry out tests and/or calibrations. It covers testing and calibration performed using standard methods, non-standard methods, and laboratory-developed methods. The auditing was conducted by auditors from Rede Metrológica RS (RMRS). The RMRS is a nonprofit association of technical and scientific nature that acts as an articulator in metrology and quality in Brazil. The main objective of this research was to identify the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements that have a higher number of non-conformities. We collected data on laboratory auditing performed in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 years that represent about 500 laboratories audits. The data analyses were conducted clustering the laboratories by calibration and test area, by ISO/IEC 17025 requirements and by year. The areas of calibration laboratories were: acoustic; length, electricity, force, torque and hardness, mass, optical, pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity, time and frequency, viscosity, volume. The areas of testing laboratories were: chemistry and physical chemistry, microbiological, biological and toxicological, mechanical and biochemistry. In the analysis were considered separately the percentages of non-conformities in technical and management requirements and also joint. Among the technical requirements with the highest number of non-conformities are Test and calibration methods and method validation (5.4) and Measurement traceability (5.6). Among the management requirements are Document control (4.3) and Control of records (4.13). Was also possible to identify which area of calibration or test showed a higher number of non-conformities. The calibration areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity and length. The testing areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were chemistry and physical chemistry and microbiological. Finally, one can see the trend of nonconformities in assessments of laboratories in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements using the result of five years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了根据ISO/ iec17025审核检测和校准实验室时发现的不符合项的分析。本标准规定了进行测试和/或校准能力的一般要求。它涵盖了使用标准方法、非标准方法和实验室开发的方法进行的测试和校准。审核由Rede Metrológica RS (RMRS)的审核员进行。RMRS是一个非营利性的技术和科学性质的协会,在巴西的计量和质量方面发挥着明确的作用。本研究的主要目的是识别有较多不符合项的ISO/IEC 17025要求。我们收集了2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年和2012年进行的实验室审计的数据,这些数据代表了大约500个实验室的审计。数据分析按校准和测试区域、ISO/IEC 17025要求和年份对实验室进行聚类。校正实验室的范围包括:声学;长度、电、力、扭矩和硬度、质量、光学、压力、流量和液位、温度和湿度、时间和频率、粘度、体积。测试实验室的领域包括:化学和物理化学、微生物学、生物和毒理学、机械和生物化学。在分析中分别考虑了技术和管理要求中不符合项的百分比,也联合考虑了不符合项的百分比。在不符合项数量最多的技术要求中,测试和校准方法及方法验证(5.4)和测量可追溯性(5.6)。管理要求包括文件控制(4.3)和记录控制(4.13)。还可以确定哪个校准或测试区域显示了更多的不符合项。不符合项数量最多的校准区域是压力、流量和液位、温度和湿度以及长度。不符合项数量最多的测试领域是化学、物理化学和微生物学。最后,使用五年的结果,可以看到实验室按照ISO/IEC 17025要求进行评估的不合格趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonconformities Analysis According to ISO/IEC 17025 in Brazil
This paper presents the analysis of nonconformities found in auditing of testing and calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025. This International Standard specifies the general requirements for the competence to carry out tests and/or calibrations. It covers testing and calibration performed using standard methods, non-standard methods, and laboratory-developed methods. The auditing was conducted by auditors from Rede Metrológica RS (RMRS). The RMRS is a nonprofit association of technical and scientific nature that acts as an articulator in metrology and quality in Brazil. The main objective of this research was to identify the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements that have a higher number of non-conformities. We collected data on laboratory auditing performed in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 years that represent about 500 laboratories audits. The data analyses were conducted clustering the laboratories by calibration and test area, by ISO/IEC 17025 requirements and by year. The areas of calibration laboratories were: acoustic; length, electricity, force, torque and hardness, mass, optical, pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity, time and frequency, viscosity, volume. The areas of testing laboratories were: chemistry and physical chemistry, microbiological, biological and toxicological, mechanical and biochemistry. In the analysis were considered separately the percentages of non-conformities in technical and management requirements and also joint. Among the technical requirements with the highest number of non-conformities are Test and calibration methods and method validation (5.4) and Measurement traceability (5.6). Among the management requirements are Document control (4.3) and Control of records (4.13). Was also possible to identify which area of calibration or test showed a higher number of non-conformities. The calibration areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were pressure, flow and level, temperature and humidity and length. The testing areas that had the highest number of non-conformities were chemistry and physical chemistry and microbiological. Finally, one can see the trend of nonconformities in assessments of laboratories in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements using the result of five years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining the Uncertainty of Frequency Measurements Referenced to GPS Disciplined Oscillators The NIST Quality System for Measurement Services: A look at its Past Decade and a Gaze towards its Future New 10V Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS) and its Application for the 2014 NCSLI JVS Interlaboratory Comparison Low Frequency Accelerometer Calibration Chalenges and Improvements Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study Using Modular Instrumentation and Lesson Learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1