Farhan Ishtiaque, Fazla Rabbi Mashrur, Mohammad Tohidul Islam Miya, Khandoker Mahmudur Rahman, R. Vaidyanathan, S. Anwar, F. Sarker, K. Mamun
{"title":"神经营销中基于ai的研究级脑机接口与商业级脑机接口的消费者偏好预测:系统比较","authors":"Farhan Ishtiaque, Fazla Rabbi Mashrur, Mohammad Tohidul Islam Miya, Khandoker Mahmudur Rahman, R. Vaidyanathan, S. Anwar, F. Sarker, K. Mamun","doi":"10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Neuromarketing, BCI technology is used to analyze how a consumer behaves in response to a marketing stimulus, to evaluate the stimuli itself. Traditionally it can be achieved by different marketing research techniques such as questioner-based surveys, interviews, field surveys, etc. But since these procedures are time-consuming and prone to human error, neuromarketing promises a more advanced, automated, and accurate solution. Most of the neuromarketing solutions use research-grade EEG devices to analyze consumer preferences, but their effectiveness using consumer-grade EEG devices is unknown. In this study, we designed an experiment to compare a research-grade EEG device with a consumer-grade EEG device for predicting consumer preference stated as affective attitude (AA) and purchase intention (PI). We determined what type of setup, processing, and algorithm brings out the best result using the two devices. EEG signals were collected while the participants were shown pictures of different products in two different setups After that several signal-processing techniques were applied to remove artifacts and multi-domain features were extracted. 50 features were selected using Recursing Feature Elimination techniques. SMOTE was used to balance out the data. After that SVM classifier was used to classify Positive and Negative consumer preferences. With the first setup, we managed to achieve 82.4 % and 85.23 % accuracy for predicting purchase intention and affective attitude respectively with the research-grade EEG device whereas we achieved 75.43% and 79.5% accuracy with the commercial-grade EEG device. With the second setup, it's 78.75% and 83.75% using the research-grade EEG device whereas it's 75% and 82.97% using the commercial-grade EEG device for purchase intention and affective attitude respectively.","PeriodicalId":131537,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based Consumers' Preference Prediction Using a Research-grade BCI and a Commercial-grade BCI for Neuromarketing: A Systematic Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Farhan Ishtiaque, Fazla Rabbi Mashrur, Mohammad Tohidul Islam Miya, Khandoker Mahmudur Rahman, R. Vaidyanathan, S. Anwar, F. Sarker, K. Mamun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Neuromarketing, BCI technology is used to analyze how a consumer behaves in response to a marketing stimulus, to evaluate the stimuli itself. Traditionally it can be achieved by different marketing research techniques such as questioner-based surveys, interviews, field surveys, etc. But since these procedures are time-consuming and prone to human error, neuromarketing promises a more advanced, automated, and accurate solution. Most of the neuromarketing solutions use research-grade EEG devices to analyze consumer preferences, but their effectiveness using consumer-grade EEG devices is unknown. In this study, we designed an experiment to compare a research-grade EEG device with a consumer-grade EEG device for predicting consumer preference stated as affective attitude (AA) and purchase intention (PI). We determined what type of setup, processing, and algorithm brings out the best result using the two devices. EEG signals were collected while the participants were shown pictures of different products in two different setups After that several signal-processing techniques were applied to remove artifacts and multi-domain features were extracted. 50 features were selected using Recursing Feature Elimination techniques. SMOTE was used to balance out the data. After that SVM classifier was used to classify Positive and Negative consumer preferences. With the first setup, we managed to achieve 82.4 % and 85.23 % accuracy for predicting purchase intention and affective attitude respectively with the research-grade EEG device whereas we achieved 75.43% and 79.5% accuracy with the commercial-grade EEG device. With the second setup, it's 78.75% and 83.75% using the research-grade EEG device whereas it's 75% and 82.97% using the commercial-grade EEG device for purchase intention and affective attitude respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
AI-based Consumers' Preference Prediction Using a Research-grade BCI and a Commercial-grade BCI for Neuromarketing: A Systematic Comparison
In Neuromarketing, BCI technology is used to analyze how a consumer behaves in response to a marketing stimulus, to evaluate the stimuli itself. Traditionally it can be achieved by different marketing research techniques such as questioner-based surveys, interviews, field surveys, etc. But since these procedures are time-consuming and prone to human error, neuromarketing promises a more advanced, automated, and accurate solution. Most of the neuromarketing solutions use research-grade EEG devices to analyze consumer preferences, but their effectiveness using consumer-grade EEG devices is unknown. In this study, we designed an experiment to compare a research-grade EEG device with a consumer-grade EEG device for predicting consumer preference stated as affective attitude (AA) and purchase intention (PI). We determined what type of setup, processing, and algorithm brings out the best result using the two devices. EEG signals were collected while the participants were shown pictures of different products in two different setups After that several signal-processing techniques were applied to remove artifacts and multi-domain features were extracted. 50 features were selected using Recursing Feature Elimination techniques. SMOTE was used to balance out the data. After that SVM classifier was used to classify Positive and Negative consumer preferences. With the first setup, we managed to achieve 82.4 % and 85.23 % accuracy for predicting purchase intention and affective attitude respectively with the research-grade EEG device whereas we achieved 75.43% and 79.5% accuracy with the commercial-grade EEG device. With the second setup, it's 78.75% and 83.75% using the research-grade EEG device whereas it's 75% and 82.97% using the commercial-grade EEG device for purchase intention and affective attitude respectively.