印度公共部门银行绩效的衡量、基准和排名

Shivani Guru, D. Mahalik
{"title":"印度公共部门银行绩效的衡量、基准和排名","authors":"Shivani Guru, D. Mahalik","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3753725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The present paper aspires to measure the performance, benchmark and rank various public sector banks using statistical as well as mathematical tools. The present study also uses Sensitivity analysis in DEA to know the stability and instability of efficient DMUs. <br><br>Design Methodology: Data are assemble from secondary sources for the year 2015-16 and these data are examine by using Multiple Regression analysis, Spearman Rank correlation test, Data Envelopment analysis, DEA Super efficiency and Sensitivity Analysis. In resent paper various inputs and outputs criteria are taken. <br><br>Findings: Multiple Regression analysis result shows for same year, also result fluctuates, when changing the output. Result of Spearman’s Rank correlation test shows that there is no correlation between different ranks when taking different set of output.Result of DEA under CRS and VRS model 6 and 10 banks are with efficiency score 1. To get most efficient bank DEA super-efficiency analysis is used, result indicates State Bank of Patiala is appeared as super efficient in both models. Sensitivity result shows in both model (CRS and VRS) after deleting input and output one after another in some cases efficient DMUs maintain its stability and in some case it became unstable. <br><br>Implication/Conclusion: The study provides valuable information on performance measurement, benchmarking, and ranking of public sector banks. The study provide information dealing with valuable factors need to be focused and pay attention to enhance the performance. The study concludes that MCDM technique is a more powerful technique to assess the performance while taking multiple inputs and outputs data simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":405783,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Financial Institutions (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring, Benchmarking and Ranking the Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks\",\"authors\":\"Shivani Guru, D. Mahalik\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3753725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The present paper aspires to measure the performance, benchmark and rank various public sector banks using statistical as well as mathematical tools. The present study also uses Sensitivity analysis in DEA to know the stability and instability of efficient DMUs. <br><br>Design Methodology: Data are assemble from secondary sources for the year 2015-16 and these data are examine by using Multiple Regression analysis, Spearman Rank correlation test, Data Envelopment analysis, DEA Super efficiency and Sensitivity Analysis. In resent paper various inputs and outputs criteria are taken. <br><br>Findings: Multiple Regression analysis result shows for same year, also result fluctuates, when changing the output. Result of Spearman’s Rank correlation test shows that there is no correlation between different ranks when taking different set of output.Result of DEA under CRS and VRS model 6 and 10 banks are with efficiency score 1. To get most efficient bank DEA super-efficiency analysis is used, result indicates State Bank of Patiala is appeared as super efficient in both models. Sensitivity result shows in both model (CRS and VRS) after deleting input and output one after another in some cases efficient DMUs maintain its stability and in some case it became unstable. <br><br>Implication/Conclusion: The study provides valuable information on performance measurement, benchmarking, and ranking of public sector banks. The study provide information dealing with valuable factors need to be focused and pay attention to enhance the performance. The study concludes that MCDM technique is a more powerful technique to assess the performance while taking multiple inputs and outputs data simultaneously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Financial Institutions (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Financial Institutions (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Financial Institutions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本论文旨在利用统计和数学工具来衡量各种公共部门银行的绩效、基准和排名。本研究还利用DEA中的敏感性分析来了解高效DMUs的稳定性和不稳定性。设计方法:2015-16年的数据来自二手来源,并通过多元回归分析、Spearman秩相关检验、数据包络分析、DEA超效率和敏感性分析对这些数据进行检验。本文采用了不同的输入和输出标准。结果:多元回归分析结果显示,当产量发生变化时,其结果在同一年出现波动。Spearman秩相关检验结果表明,取不同的输出集时,不同的秩之间不存在相关性。CRS和VRS模型下的DEA结果显示,6家和10家银行的效率得分为1分。为了获得最高效的银行,采用DEA超效率分析,结果表明,在两个模型中,帕蒂亚拉国家银行都表现出超效率。灵敏度结果表明,在依次删除输入和输出后,两种模型(CRS和VRS)在某些情况下保持稳定,在某些情况下变得不稳定。含义/结论:本研究为公共部门银行的绩效评估、基准制定和排名提供了有价值的信息。本研究提供了处理有价值因素的信息,需要关注和注意,以提高绩效。研究表明,MCDM技术在同时获取多个输入和输出数据的情况下,是一种更强大的性能评估技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring, Benchmarking and Ranking the Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks
Objectives: The present paper aspires to measure the performance, benchmark and rank various public sector banks using statistical as well as mathematical tools. The present study also uses Sensitivity analysis in DEA to know the stability and instability of efficient DMUs.

Design Methodology: Data are assemble from secondary sources for the year 2015-16 and these data are examine by using Multiple Regression analysis, Spearman Rank correlation test, Data Envelopment analysis, DEA Super efficiency and Sensitivity Analysis. In resent paper various inputs and outputs criteria are taken.

Findings: Multiple Regression analysis result shows for same year, also result fluctuates, when changing the output. Result of Spearman’s Rank correlation test shows that there is no correlation between different ranks when taking different set of output.Result of DEA under CRS and VRS model 6 and 10 banks are with efficiency score 1. To get most efficient bank DEA super-efficiency analysis is used, result indicates State Bank of Patiala is appeared as super efficient in both models. Sensitivity result shows in both model (CRS and VRS) after deleting input and output one after another in some cases efficient DMUs maintain its stability and in some case it became unstable.

Implication/Conclusion: The study provides valuable information on performance measurement, benchmarking, and ranking of public sector banks. The study provide information dealing with valuable factors need to be focused and pay attention to enhance the performance. The study concludes that MCDM technique is a more powerful technique to assess the performance while taking multiple inputs and outputs data simultaneously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitalization-Enabled Evolution of Customer Value Creation: An Executive View in Financial Services Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Organizational Performance. Case of Selected Micro Financial Institutions (MFIs) In Yaoundé, Cameroon Corruption and bank risk-taking: The deterring role of Shari’ah supervision The Internationalization of Domestic Banks and the Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Bank Information Production Over the Business Cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1