基于树结构分类器的蛋白质折叠预测方法

P. Shiguihara-Juárez, D. Mauricio-Sánchez, Alneu de Andrade Lopes
{"title":"基于树结构分类器的蛋白质折叠预测方法","authors":"P. Shiguihara-Juárez, D. Mauricio-Sánchez, Alneu de Andrade Lopes","doi":"10.1109/INTERCON.2017.8079723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein fold recognition is an important task in the biological area. Different machine learning methods such as multiclass classifiers, one-vs-all and ensemble nested dichotomies were applied to this task and, in most of the cases, multiclass approaches were used. In this paper, we compare classifiers organized in tree structures to classify folds. We used a benchmark dataset containing 125 features to predict folds, comparing different supervised methods and achieving 54% of accuracy. An approach related to tree-structure of classifiers obtained better results in comparison with a hierarchical approach.","PeriodicalId":229086,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches based on tree-structures classifiers to protein fold prediction\",\"authors\":\"P. Shiguihara-Juárez, D. Mauricio-Sánchez, Alneu de Andrade Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INTERCON.2017.8079723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protein fold recognition is an important task in the biological area. Different machine learning methods such as multiclass classifiers, one-vs-all and ensemble nested dichotomies were applied to this task and, in most of the cases, multiclass approaches were used. In this paper, we compare classifiers organized in tree structures to classify folds. We used a benchmark dataset containing 125 features to predict folds, comparing different supervised methods and achieving 54% of accuracy. An approach related to tree-structure of classifiers obtained better results in comparison with a hierarchical approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTERCON.2017.8079723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTERCON.2017.8079723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

蛋白质折叠识别是生物学领域的一项重要任务。不同的机器学习方法,如多类分类器、一对一和集成嵌套二分法被应用于这项任务,在大多数情况下,使用了多类方法。在本文中,我们比较了树形结构的分类器对折叠的分类。我们使用包含125个特征的基准数据集来预测褶皱,比较不同的监督方法,准确率达到54%。与分类器的树状结构相关的分类器方法获得了比分层方法更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches based on tree-structures classifiers to protein fold prediction
Protein fold recognition is an important task in the biological area. Different machine learning methods such as multiclass classifiers, one-vs-all and ensemble nested dichotomies were applied to this task and, in most of the cases, multiclass approaches were used. In this paper, we compare classifiers organized in tree structures to classify folds. We used a benchmark dataset containing 125 features to predict folds, comparing different supervised methods and achieving 54% of accuracy. An approach related to tree-structure of classifiers obtained better results in comparison with a hierarchical approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating informatics security in an organization: The minimal distance method Comparison of wavelet transform symlets (2-10) and daubechies (2-10) for an electroencephalographic signal analysis Nonlinear modeling of magnetic materials for electromagnetic devices simulation Integration of IT frameworks for the management of information security within industrial control systems providing metrics and indicators V/F control of an induction motor with THD optimization using cascaded multilevel converters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1