沟通不同的评分方案:如何将学生的注意力从分数转移到学习上

Sarah E. Brown, Victoria C. Chávez
{"title":"沟通不同的评分方案:如何将学生的注意力从分数转移到学习上","authors":"Sarah E. Brown, Victoria C. Chávez","doi":"10.1145/3478432.3499200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mounting evidence shows that distribution enforcing grading schemes that rank students undermine learning. Alternative assessment schemes such as specifications grading, ungrading, and competency-based grading center learning and create a more equitable learning environment. However, to implement such a shift in a course requires a bigger lift from instructors. Students enter our courses expecting certain things; the long-term benefits of more equitable, learning-centered grading schemes can be clouded by the initial anxiety about encountering something new. In this BoF, we will create a space for instructors to discuss their fears, challenges, and solutions in adopting assessment practices and strategies, from the assignment level to the course level, that aligns with learning and equity. In particular, we will focus on discussing how to communicate the need for and benefits of said practices to students, and how these practices can help shift students' attention away from their grades and toward their learning.","PeriodicalId":113773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating Alternative Grading Schemes: How to Shift Students' Attention to Their Learning from Grades\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Brown, Victoria C. Chávez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3478432.3499200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mounting evidence shows that distribution enforcing grading schemes that rank students undermine learning. Alternative assessment schemes such as specifications grading, ungrading, and competency-based grading center learning and create a more equitable learning environment. However, to implement such a shift in a course requires a bigger lift from instructors. Students enter our courses expecting certain things; the long-term benefits of more equitable, learning-centered grading schemes can be clouded by the initial anxiety about encountering something new. In this BoF, we will create a space for instructors to discuss their fears, challenges, and solutions in adopting assessment practices and strategies, from the assignment level to the course level, that aligns with learning and equity. In particular, we will focus on discussing how to communicate the need for and benefits of said practices to students, and how these practices can help shift students' attention away from their grades and toward their learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,分配强制实行给学生排名的评分方案会破坏学习。替代的评估方案,如规格评分、不评分和基于能力的评分中心学习,创造一个更公平的学习环境。然而,要在课程中实施这样的转变,需要教师做出更大的努力。学生进入我们的课程,期望得到某些东西;更公平、以学习为中心的评分方案的长期好处可能会被一开始对遇到新事物的焦虑蒙上阴影。在这个BoF中,我们将为教师创造一个空间,讨论他们在采用评估实践和策略时的恐惧、挑战和解决方案,从作业层面到课程层面,与学习和公平保持一致。特别是,我们将重点讨论如何向学生传达上述实践的必要性和益处,以及这些实践如何帮助学生将注意力从成绩转移到学习上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communicating Alternative Grading Schemes: How to Shift Students' Attention to Their Learning from Grades
Mounting evidence shows that distribution enforcing grading schemes that rank students undermine learning. Alternative assessment schemes such as specifications grading, ungrading, and competency-based grading center learning and create a more equitable learning environment. However, to implement such a shift in a course requires a bigger lift from instructors. Students enter our courses expecting certain things; the long-term benefits of more equitable, learning-centered grading schemes can be clouded by the initial anxiety about encountering something new. In this BoF, we will create a space for instructors to discuss their fears, challenges, and solutions in adopting assessment practices and strategies, from the assignment level to the course level, that aligns with learning and equity. In particular, we will focus on discussing how to communicate the need for and benefits of said practices to students, and how these practices can help shift students' attention away from their grades and toward their learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Input and Engagement for CS202x: Data Management The Development of Computational Thinking in Computing Higher Education Understanding and Tracking Computing Instructor Identity The Effect of Animations Using Real-world Analogies on Diverse Computer Systems Students SIGCSE Reads 2022: Using Challenging Stories in your Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1