ColSpace:迈向算法/实现协同优化

Jiawei Huang, J. Lach
{"title":"ColSpace:迈向算法/实现协同优化","authors":"Jiawei Huang, J. Lach","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are physical implementations of algorithms, so implementation metrics are determined in large part by the algorithm specification. However, the system abstraction layers that have been developed to manage the ever-increasing complexity of digital systems separate algorithm designers from hardware designers, forcing the latter to work within the design space specified by the former, even for applications such as multimedia that do not have hard fidelity requirements. Designers typically employ informal iterative design to adjust fidelity, but a formal design methodology would increase designer efficiency and improve the quality of the solutions. This paper introduces such a methodology (and accompanying tool) that enables algorithm and implementation metrics to be co-optimized during early design exploration, opening the design space to include solutions that may provide, for example, significant performance improvements while only slightly compromising fidelity. Hierarchical dependency graphs (HDGs) are used to represent both the algorithm and the implementation architecture, providing a common interface through which algorithm designers and hardware designers can explore the collaborative space (ColSpace) together. Using the proposed technique, the ColSpace tool can trade off various metrics to find the best overall design while managing complexity with the HDG hierarchy. Two image processing case studies demonstrate that in ColSpace-optimized designs, latency savings can exceed fidelity losses, resulting in cost function reductions that would not have been possible without this co-optimization methodology.","PeriodicalId":256908,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ColSpace: Towards algorithm/implementation co-optimization\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Huang, J. Lach\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are physical implementations of algorithms, so implementation metrics are determined in large part by the algorithm specification. However, the system abstraction layers that have been developed to manage the ever-increasing complexity of digital systems separate algorithm designers from hardware designers, forcing the latter to work within the design space specified by the former, even for applications such as multimedia that do not have hard fidelity requirements. Designers typically employ informal iterative design to adjust fidelity, but a formal design methodology would increase designer efficiency and improve the quality of the solutions. This paper introduces such a methodology (and accompanying tool) that enables algorithm and implementation metrics to be co-optimized during early design exploration, opening the design space to include solutions that may provide, for example, significant performance improvements while only slightly compromising fidelity. Hierarchical dependency graphs (HDGs) are used to represent both the algorithm and the implementation architecture, providing a common interface through which algorithm designers and hardware designers can explore the collaborative space (ColSpace) together. Using the proposed technique, the ColSpace tool can trade off various metrics to find the best overall design while managing complexity with the HDG hierarchy. Two image processing case studies demonstrate that in ColSpace-optimized designs, latency savings can exceed fidelity losses, resulting in cost function reductions that would not have been possible without this co-optimization methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2009.5413125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

专用集成电路(asic)是算法的物理实现,因此实现指标在很大程度上由算法规范决定。然而,为了管理数字系统日益增加的复杂性而开发的系统抽象层将算法设计人员与硬件设计人员分开,迫使后者在前者指定的设计空间内工作,即使对于诸如多媒体之类没有硬保真要求的应用程序也是如此。设计师通常采用非正式的迭代设计来调整保真度,但正式的设计方法可以提高设计师的效率并改善解决方案的质量。本文介绍了这样一种方法(以及附带的工具),使算法和实现指标能够在早期设计探索中协同优化,打开设计空间,包括可能提供的解决方案,例如,显著的性能改进,同时只略微损害保真度。分层依赖图(HDGs)用于表示算法和实现架构,提供了一个通用接口,通过该接口,算法设计者和硬件设计者可以一起探索协作空间(ColSpace)。使用提出的技术,ColSpace工具可以权衡各种指标,找到最佳的整体设计,同时管理HDG层次结构的复杂性。两个图像处理案例研究表明,在colspace优化设计中,延迟节省可以超过保真度损失,从而导致成本函数的降低,如果没有这种协同优化方法,这是不可能实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ColSpace: Towards algorithm/implementation co-optimization
Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are physical implementations of algorithms, so implementation metrics are determined in large part by the algorithm specification. However, the system abstraction layers that have been developed to manage the ever-increasing complexity of digital systems separate algorithm designers from hardware designers, forcing the latter to work within the design space specified by the former, even for applications such as multimedia that do not have hard fidelity requirements. Designers typically employ informal iterative design to adjust fidelity, but a formal design methodology would increase designer efficiency and improve the quality of the solutions. This paper introduces such a methodology (and accompanying tool) that enables algorithm and implementation metrics to be co-optimized during early design exploration, opening the design space to include solutions that may provide, for example, significant performance improvements while only slightly compromising fidelity. Hierarchical dependency graphs (HDGs) are used to represent both the algorithm and the implementation architecture, providing a common interface through which algorithm designers and hardware designers can explore the collaborative space (ColSpace) together. Using the proposed technique, the ColSpace tool can trade off various metrics to find the best overall design while managing complexity with the HDG hierarchy. Two image processing case studies demonstrate that in ColSpace-optimized designs, latency savings can exceed fidelity losses, resulting in cost function reductions that would not have been possible without this co-optimization methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical performance models for 3T1D memories A novel SoC architecture on FPGA for ultra fast face detection A Technology-Agnostic Simulation Environment (TASE) for iterative custom IC design across processes Low-overhead error detection for Networks-on-Chip Interconnect performance corners considering crosstalk noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1