第五章:“不只是为钱而哭泣”:繁荣与危机时期的冰岛与全球化

Kristín Loftsdóttir, M. Mixa
{"title":"第五章:“不只是为钱而哭泣”:繁荣与危机时期的冰岛与全球化","authors":"Kristín Loftsdóttir, M. Mixa","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe enormous financial losses during the economic crash in Iceland led to widespread anxieties, coupled with a deep sense of shared national disaster and moral collapse (Bernburg, 2015; Olafsson, 2014). The strong sense of betrayal indicates how economic processes are not only about economic prosperity, but are embedded also in wider societal discourses and a sense of national identity (Schwegler, 2009). We use perspectives from anthropology and cultural economics to ask how the lack of trust by the Icelandic population after the crash signals both a different way of visualising Iceland’s role within an increasingly global world and a changing sense of Icelanders as national subjects standing unified against foreigners. Iceland’s neo-liberalisation inserted the country into global institutions and processes with the faith that these processes would automatically be beneficial to Iceland. Furthermore, the sense of some kind of a unified Icelandic subject was manifested in the image of the ‘Business Viking’, which was seen as embodying the interest of the Icelandic nation as a whole. Following the economic crash, the betrayal of trust involved disrupting the idea of the ‘oneness’ of Iceland and thus, the sharp distinction between ‘us’ Icelanders and ‘those’ foreigners. In our discussion, we trace different ways of conceptualising this sense of Icelanders as a unified entity, asking what this notion means in terms of trust. Our research shows how the sense of ‘unified Icelanders’ was instrumental in creating the feeling of trust, and how it is possible to manipulate and appropriate that trust.","PeriodicalId":145304,"journal":{"name":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 5: ‘Not Just Crying About the Money’: Iceland and Globalisation During Boom and Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Kristín Loftsdóttir, M. Mixa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThe enormous financial losses during the economic crash in Iceland led to widespread anxieties, coupled with a deep sense of shared national disaster and moral collapse (Bernburg, 2015; Olafsson, 2014). The strong sense of betrayal indicates how economic processes are not only about economic prosperity, but are embedded also in wider societal discourses and a sense of national identity (Schwegler, 2009). We use perspectives from anthropology and cultural economics to ask how the lack of trust by the Icelandic population after the crash signals both a different way of visualising Iceland’s role within an increasingly global world and a changing sense of Icelanders as national subjects standing unified against foreigners. Iceland’s neo-liberalisation inserted the country into global institutions and processes with the faith that these processes would automatically be beneficial to Iceland. Furthermore, the sense of some kind of a unified Icelandic subject was manifested in the image of the ‘Business Viking’, which was seen as embodying the interest of the Icelandic nation as a whole. Following the economic crash, the betrayal of trust involved disrupting the idea of the ‘oneness’ of Iceland and thus, the sharp distinction between ‘us’ Icelanders and ‘those’ foreigners. In our discussion, we trace different ways of conceptualising this sense of Icelanders as a unified entity, asking what this notion means in terms of trust. Our research shows how the sense of ‘unified Icelanders’ was instrumental in creating the feeling of trust, and how it is possible to manipulate and appropriate that trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冰岛经济崩溃期间的巨大金融损失导致了广泛的焦虑,加上共同的国家灾难和道德崩溃的深刻感觉(Bernburg, 2015;Olafsson, 2014)。强烈的背叛感表明,经济进程不仅与经济繁荣有关,而且还嵌入到更广泛的社会话语和民族认同感中(Schwegler, 2009)。我们从人类学和文化经济学的角度来探讨,冰岛人在经济崩溃后缺乏信任,是如何以一种不同的方式来看待冰岛在日益全球化的世界中所扮演的角色,以及冰岛人作为国家主体团结起来反对外国人的变化。冰岛的新自由化将该国纳入了全球机构和进程,并相信这些进程将自动对冰岛有利。此外,某种统一的冰岛主体感体现在“商业维京人”的形象上,这被视为冰岛民族整体利益的体现。在经济崩溃之后,对信任的背叛破坏了冰岛“一体性”的观念,从而破坏了“我们”冰岛人和“那些”外国人之间的明显区别。在我们的讨论中,我们追溯了冰岛人作为一个统一实体的概念的不同方式,并询问了这个概念在信任方面意味着什么。我们的研究表明,“统一的冰岛人”在创造信任感方面是如何发挥作用的,以及如何操纵和利用这种信任感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 5: ‘Not Just Crying About the Money’: Iceland and Globalisation During Boom and Crisis
Abstract The enormous financial losses during the economic crash in Iceland led to widespread anxieties, coupled with a deep sense of shared national disaster and moral collapse (Bernburg, 2015; Olafsson, 2014). The strong sense of betrayal indicates how economic processes are not only about economic prosperity, but are embedded also in wider societal discourses and a sense of national identity (Schwegler, 2009). We use perspectives from anthropology and cultural economics to ask how the lack of trust by the Icelandic population after the crash signals both a different way of visualising Iceland’s role within an increasingly global world and a changing sense of Icelanders as national subjects standing unified against foreigners. Iceland’s neo-liberalisation inserted the country into global institutions and processes with the faith that these processes would automatically be beneficial to Iceland. Furthermore, the sense of some kind of a unified Icelandic subject was manifested in the image of the ‘Business Viking’, which was seen as embodying the interest of the Icelandic nation as a whole. Following the economic crash, the betrayal of trust involved disrupting the idea of the ‘oneness’ of Iceland and thus, the sharp distinction between ‘us’ Icelanders and ‘those’ foreigners. In our discussion, we trace different ways of conceptualising this sense of Icelanders as a unified entity, asking what this notion means in terms of trust. Our research shows how the sense of ‘unified Icelanders’ was instrumental in creating the feeling of trust, and how it is possible to manipulate and appropriate that trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 11: Post-Crisis Regulation and Supervision of Icelandic Banks Chapter 5: ‘Not Just Crying About the Money’: Iceland and Globalisation During Boom and Crisis Chapter 10: Trust and Financial Services: The Impact of Increasing Digitalisation and the Financial Crisis Chapter 4: Trust: Some Questions from a Layperson Chapter 12: Restoring Trust Through Improved Corporate Governance and Adherence to Gender Quotas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1