公众对投资仲裁的看法

Tony Cole, P. Ortolani
{"title":"公众对投资仲裁的看法","authors":"Tony Cole, P. Ortolani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2733046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the controversies around the incorporation of investment arbitration into the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It was drafted to be read by a non-specialist audience, and addresses the primary arguments made regarding the use of arbitration in the TTIP. For each argument it offers a clear explanation of the opposing positions, and then presents an accessible analysis of the issue on the basis of the available evidence.The paper was originally prepared at the request of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, and was produced under a grant from the Parliament for a study on arbitration in the European Union. It was supplied to the Parliament in late 2014.","PeriodicalId":320573,"journal":{"name":"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Public Perception of Investment Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Tony Cole, P. Ortolani\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2733046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the controversies around the incorporation of investment arbitration into the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It was drafted to be read by a non-specialist audience, and addresses the primary arguments made regarding the use of arbitration in the TTIP. For each argument it offers a clear explanation of the opposing positions, and then presents an accessible analysis of the issue on the basis of the available evidence.The paper was originally prepared at the request of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, and was produced under a grant from the Parliament for a study on arbitration in the European Union. It was supplied to the Parliament in late 2014.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了围绕将投资仲裁纳入跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴关系(TTIP)的争议。它的起草目的是供非专业听众阅读,并讨论了关于在TTIP中使用仲裁的主要论点。对于每一个论点,它都对对立的立场提供了清晰的解释,然后在现有证据的基础上对问题进行了易于理解的分析。该文件最初是应欧洲议会法律事务委员会的要求编写的,是在欧洲议会为一项关于欧洲联盟仲裁的研究提供的赠款下编写的。它是在2014年底提供给议会的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Public Perception of Investment Arbitration
This paper examines the controversies around the incorporation of investment arbitration into the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It was drafted to be read by a non-specialist audience, and addresses the primary arguments made regarding the use of arbitration in the TTIP. For each argument it offers a clear explanation of the opposing positions, and then presents an accessible analysis of the issue on the basis of the available evidence.The paper was originally prepared at the request of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, and was produced under a grant from the Parliament for a study on arbitration in the European Union. It was supplied to the Parliament in late 2014.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monitor and the Competition and Markets Authority The Public Perception of Investment Arbitration Foreign Precedents in Judicial Argument: A Theoretical Account When Investment Law Takes Over: Towards a New Legal Regime to Regulate Asia Pacific's Submarine Cables Boom Rediscovering the Contract of Employment for Non-Standard Workers in the UK Common Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1