{"title":"电动汽车PI、SMC和PI滑模控制器的性能比较","authors":"A. Ltifi, M. Ghariani, R. Neji","doi":"10.1109/STA.2014.7086731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.","PeriodicalId":125957,"journal":{"name":"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of PI, SMC and PI-Sliding Mode Controller for EV\",\"authors\":\"A. Ltifi, M. Ghariani, R. Neji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STA.2014.7086731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2014.7086731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2014.7086731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of PI, SMC and PI-Sliding Mode Controller for EV
This paper presents three different control strategies for controlling an induction motor “IM” in an electric vehicle (EV) application. The control techniques analyzed and compared are: the proportion-integral regulator (PI), the sliding mode control (SMC) and the PI-Sliding Mode Control (PI-SMC). Simulation results show the comparison performance in term of robustness.