论证驱动型探究教学模式在职前科学教师科学史教学中的设计与应用

Zhixia Zheng, Xinman Li, T. Long
{"title":"论证驱动型探究教学模式在职前科学教师科学史教学中的设计与应用","authors":"Zhixia Zheng, Xinman Li, T. Long","doi":"10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) instructional model combines inquiry activities with argumentation, avoiding that traditional inquiry activities are often a mere formality, and has the potential to improve learners' argumentation skills. In this study, ADI instructional model was applied to the instruction of history of science in a compulsory course General Introduction to Natural Science for pre-service science teachers. The ADI instructional activities were conducted with the form of flipped classroom. Its effectiveness on promoting students' understanding of scientific knowledge and written argument skills was proved in a single group pre-posttest design experiment. The results of paired sample T -test and one-way ANOVA analysis show that ADI was effective on improving the participants' written argument skills and understanding of scientific knowledge. It shows better effect on improving the participants' accuracy of a claim and quality of evidence.","PeriodicalId":365516,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and Applying an Argument-Driven Inquiry Instructional Model in the Teaching of History of Science for Pre-Service Science Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Zhixia Zheng, Xinman Li, T. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) instructional model combines inquiry activities with argumentation, avoiding that traditional inquiry activities are often a mere formality, and has the potential to improve learners' argumentation skills. In this study, ADI instructional model was applied to the instruction of history of science in a compulsory course General Introduction to Natural Science for pre-service science teachers. The ADI instructional activities were conducted with the form of flipped classroom. Its effectiveness on promoting students' understanding of scientific knowledge and written argument skills was proved in a single group pre-posttest design experiment. The results of paired sample T -test and one-way ANOVA analysis show that ADI was effective on improving the participants' written argument skills and understanding of scientific knowledge. It shows better effect on improving the participants' accuracy of a claim and quality of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

论证驱动型探究(ADI)教学模式将探究活动与论证相结合,避免了传统的探究活动往往流于形式,并有可能提高学习者的论证技能。本研究将ADI教学模式应用于职前科学教师必修课程《自然科学概论》的科学史教学。ADI教学活动以翻转课堂的形式进行。在单组前测后设计实验中证明了其对促进学生对科学知识的理解和书面论证技能的有效性。配对样本T检验和单因素方差分析结果表明,ADI对提高参与者的书面论证技能和对科学知识的理解是有效的。它对提高参与者的索赔准确性和证据质量有较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing and Applying an Argument-Driven Inquiry Instructional Model in the Teaching of History of Science for Pre-Service Science Teachers
Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) instructional model combines inquiry activities with argumentation, avoiding that traditional inquiry activities are often a mere formality, and has the potential to improve learners' argumentation skills. In this study, ADI instructional model was applied to the instruction of history of science in a compulsory course General Introduction to Natural Science for pre-service science teachers. The ADI instructional activities were conducted with the form of flipped classroom. Its effectiveness on promoting students' understanding of scientific knowledge and written argument skills was proved in a single group pre-posttest design experiment. The results of paired sample T -test and one-way ANOVA analysis show that ADI was effective on improving the participants' written argument skills and understanding of scientific knowledge. It shows better effect on improving the participants' accuracy of a claim and quality of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progress Tracking and Online Learning Assisted by Social Media Tools: A Case Study of Teaching Architectural Design Research on the Improvement of MOOC-Based Self-Organized Online Teaching and Research Participation Degree for Primary and Secondary School Teachers Embodiment and Cultivation of Media Literacy in the Business English Teaching Context: A Corpus-Driven Study on Textbooks The Golden Ratio of Instructive Content to Entertaining Content in Mobile Augmented Reality Games How to Implement Efficient Blended Learning: The Effects of Teacher Support and Task Difficulty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1