在不同抽象层次测试逻辑电路:一个实验评估

S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin
{"title":"在不同抽象层次测试逻辑电路:一个实验评估","authors":"S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin","doi":"10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.","PeriodicalId":364686,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing logic circuits at different abstraction levels: An experimental evaluation\",\"authors\":\"S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对数字电路测试生成方法进行了实验评估。考虑了两种方法:基于efsm的方法,针对高级(RTL)描述的代码覆盖率,以及基于低级(门)描述的等效检查。为生成的测试测量高级代码和低级故障覆盖率。为几个故障模型生成低级突变体。已经对ITC'99基准的一个子集进行了实验。结果表明,在大多数情况下,RTL试验的突变覆盖率仍然很低。反之亦然,低级测试与高级测试具有更低或相同的RTL代码覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing logic circuits at different abstraction levels: An experimental evaluation
The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Secure scan-based design using Blum Blum Shub algorithm Multiversion parallel synthesis of digital structures based on SystemC specification The radiation-hardened differential difference operational amplifiers for operation in the low-temperature analog interfaces of sensors Approximation of the central chi-squared distribution for on-line computation of the threshold for energy detector Electrodynamic characteristics estimation for aperiodic random composite media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1