S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin
{"title":"在不同抽象层次测试逻辑电路:一个实验评估","authors":"S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin","doi":"10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.","PeriodicalId":364686,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing logic circuits at different abstraction levels: An experimental evaluation\",\"authors\":\"S. Smolov, Jorge López, N. Kushik, N. Yevtushenko, M. Chupilko, A. Kamkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS.2016.7807687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing logic circuits at different abstraction levels: An experimental evaluation
The paper presents an experimental evaluation of test generation methods for digital circuits. Two methods are considered: an EFSM-based one, aimed at the code coverage of high-level (RTL) descriptions, and an equivalence-checking based on low-level (gate) description. High-level code and low-level fault coverage are measured for generated tests. Low-level mutants were generated for several fault models. Experiments have been performed for a subset of ITC'99 benchmarks. The results show that in most cases, the mutant coverage remains rather low for RTL tests. Vice versa, low-level tests have lower or the same RTL code coverage as high-level ones.