SOFR预估衍生品定价:远期市场模型中的凸性调整

Jonathan Rosen
{"title":"SOFR预估衍生品定价:远期市场模型中的凸性调整","authors":"Jonathan Rosen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3903069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the USD Libor interest rate benchmark is in the process of being discontinued, there is an increasing occurrence of SOFR-based loans and derivatives. Whereas Libor was most commonly set in-advance, an important difference is that SOFR is commonly set in-arrears when it is used in instruments such as overnight index swaps. Loans and interest-rate cap options used as hedges may both choose to fix the SOFR rate in-advance, which is similar to Libor by allowing the rate to be known in-advance of the interest accrual period. Here we adopt the mild assumption of bivariate normal log-forward rates for adjacent rate periods in the forward market model to derive the convexity adjustment for contracts which reference SOFR in-advance. Due to martingale conditions, when adjacent forward rates are uncorrelated there is no convexity adjustment, but when there is non-zero correlation, there is a convexity adjustment for any derivative payoff including the SOFR in-advance forward rate and the caplet/floorlet payoff which references this rate. These results demonstrate that SOFR in-advance derivatives are correlation-sensitive in their pricing and risk management, which is notably more complex than the situation for Libor.","PeriodicalId":209192,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOFR In-Advance Derivative Pricing: Convexity Adjustment in the Forward Market Model\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3903069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the USD Libor interest rate benchmark is in the process of being discontinued, there is an increasing occurrence of SOFR-based loans and derivatives. Whereas Libor was most commonly set in-advance, an important difference is that SOFR is commonly set in-arrears when it is used in instruments such as overnight index swaps. Loans and interest-rate cap options used as hedges may both choose to fix the SOFR rate in-advance, which is similar to Libor by allowing the rate to be known in-advance of the interest accrual period. Here we adopt the mild assumption of bivariate normal log-forward rates for adjacent rate periods in the forward market model to derive the convexity adjustment for contracts which reference SOFR in-advance. Due to martingale conditions, when adjacent forward rates are uncorrelated there is no convexity adjustment, but when there is non-zero correlation, there is a convexity adjustment for any derivative payoff including the SOFR in-advance forward rate and the caplet/floorlet payoff which references this rate. These results demonstrate that SOFR in-advance derivatives are correlation-sensitive in their pricing and risk management, which is notably more complex than the situation for Libor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着美元Libor基准利率的终止,基于sofr的贷款和衍生品越来越多。Libor通常是提前设定的,而一个重要区别在于,SOFR在用于隔夜指数掉期等工具时,通常是提前设定的。用作对冲的贷款和利率上限期权都可能选择提前确定SOFR利率,这与Libor类似,允许在利息应计期之前就知道利率。在远期市场模型中,我们对相邻利率期的二元正态对数远期利率进行温和假设,推导出提前参考SOFR的合约的凸度调整。由于鞅条件,当相邻远期利率不相关时,不存在凸性调整,但当存在非零相关性时,任何衍生收益,包括SOFR提前远期利率和参考该利率的caplet/floorlet收益,都存在凸性调整。这些结果表明,SOFR提前衍生品在定价和风险管理方面具有相关性敏感性,明显比Libor更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOFR In-Advance Derivative Pricing: Convexity Adjustment in the Forward Market Model
As the USD Libor interest rate benchmark is in the process of being discontinued, there is an increasing occurrence of SOFR-based loans and derivatives. Whereas Libor was most commonly set in-advance, an important difference is that SOFR is commonly set in-arrears when it is used in instruments such as overnight index swaps. Loans and interest-rate cap options used as hedges may both choose to fix the SOFR rate in-advance, which is similar to Libor by allowing the rate to be known in-advance of the interest accrual period. Here we adopt the mild assumption of bivariate normal log-forward rates for adjacent rate periods in the forward market model to derive the convexity adjustment for contracts which reference SOFR in-advance. Due to martingale conditions, when adjacent forward rates are uncorrelated there is no convexity adjustment, but when there is non-zero correlation, there is a convexity adjustment for any derivative payoff including the SOFR in-advance forward rate and the caplet/floorlet payoff which references this rate. These results demonstrate that SOFR in-advance derivatives are correlation-sensitive in their pricing and risk management, which is notably more complex than the situation for Libor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long Run Risks in FX Markets: Are They There? Asset Pricing with Panel Trees Under Global Split Criteria Efficient LOESS For Financial Applications Infinite but Rare: Valuation and Pricing in Marketplaces for Blockchain-Based Nonfungible Tokens On Robust Inference for Consumption-based Asset Pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1