学习风格:一项诊断性研究,在大学经济和行政科学中心

Q3 Social Sciences Revista de la Educacion Superior Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resu.2015.09.005
Heriberto de Jesús Domínguez Rodríguez , Jorge Alberto Gutiérrez Limón , Manuel Llontop Pisfil , David Villalobos Torres , Jean Claude Delva Exume
{"title":"学习风格:一项诊断性研究,在大学经济和行政科学中心","authors":"Heriberto de Jesús Domínguez Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Gutiérrez Limón ,&nbsp;Manuel Llontop Pisfil ,&nbsp;David Villalobos Torres ,&nbsp;Jean Claude Delva Exume","doi":"10.1016/j.resu.2015.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research analyzes the use of learning styles in different university majors and their relationship with the academic performance of entering students in the 2014-A academic year, at the University Center for Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guadalajara. The research hypotheses contrast in multivariate and discriminant function analysis with a sample of 338 students who responded to the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles (CHAEA) Questionnaires. The research provides a descriptive analysis of the different learning styles, and reveals moderate preferences among students. In general, the male students showed a greater preference for the Active and Pragmatic learning styles. In addition, there were statistically significant differences with regard to the Theoretical and the Pragmatic styles; students undergoing degrees in tourism showed a preference for the former, while the marketing students preferred the later.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2015.09.005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estilos de aprendizaje: un estudio diagnóstico en el centro universitario de ciencias económico-administrativas de la U de G*\",\"authors\":\"Heriberto de Jesús Domínguez Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Gutiérrez Limón ,&nbsp;Manuel Llontop Pisfil ,&nbsp;David Villalobos Torres ,&nbsp;Jean Claude Delva Exume\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resu.2015.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research analyzes the use of learning styles in different university majors and their relationship with the academic performance of entering students in the 2014-A academic year, at the University Center for Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guadalajara. The research hypotheses contrast in multivariate and discriminant function analysis with a sample of 338 students who responded to the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles (CHAEA) Questionnaires. The research provides a descriptive analysis of the different learning styles, and reveals moderate preferences among students. In general, the male students showed a greater preference for the Active and Pragmatic learning styles. In addition, there were statistically significant differences with regard to the Theoretical and the Pragmatic styles; students undergoing degrees in tourism showed a preference for the former, while the marketing students preferred the later.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Educacion Superior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2015.09.005\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Educacion Superior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185276015001053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185276015001053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究分析了瓜达拉哈拉大学经济与行政科学大学中心2014-A学年新生在不同大学专业中学习风格的使用情况及其与学习成绩的关系。本研究以参加Honey-Alonso学习风格(CHAEA)问卷调查的338名学生为样本,进行多元分析和判别函数分析。该研究对不同的学习风格进行了描述性分析,并揭示了学生的适度偏好。总体而言,男生更倾向于主动和务实的学习方式。此外,在理论风格和语用风格方面也存在统计学上的显著差异;旅游专业的学生更倾向于前者,而市场营销专业的学生更倾向于后者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estilos de aprendizaje: un estudio diagnóstico en el centro universitario de ciencias económico-administrativas de la U de G*

This research analyzes the use of learning styles in different university majors and their relationship with the academic performance of entering students in the 2014-A academic year, at the University Center for Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guadalajara. The research hypotheses contrast in multivariate and discriminant function analysis with a sample of 338 students who responded to the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles (CHAEA) Questionnaires. The research provides a descriptive analysis of the different learning styles, and reveals moderate preferences among students. In general, the male students showed a greater preference for the Active and Pragmatic learning styles. In addition, there were statistically significant differences with regard to the Theoretical and the Pragmatic styles; students undergoing degrees in tourism showed a preference for the former, while the marketing students preferred the later.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de la Educacion Superior
Revista de la Educacion Superior Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de la Educación Superior (RESU) es un medio que se propone publicar textos académicos originales sobre la educación superior mexicana, con apertura a la dimensión internacional. Sus destinatarios son tanto investigadores que trabajan temas de educación superior como directivos, especialistas e interesados en planeación, evaluación y gestión de las instituciones y sistemas de educación superior. Por consiguiente, se difunden artículos de investigación, ensayos académicos y reseñas críticas, que propicien que los lectores enriquezcan su bagaje conceptual y analítico, y amplíen su conocimiento acerca de los retos que enfrentan los sistemas e instituciones de educación superior en los entornos nacional e internacional.
期刊最新文献
Grupos de investigación en educación: hacia una tipología multirreferencial desde casos representativos Juventud de los estudiantes universitarios Las universidades públicas mexicanas: los retos de las transformaciones institucionales hacia la investigación y la transferencia de conocimiento Ser y quehacer del psicólogo social, práctica profesional de egresados Patentamiento universitario e innovación en México, país en desarrollo: teoría y política
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1