SynEva:通过镜像程序合成评估ML程序

Yi Qin, Huiyan Wang, Chang Xu, Xiaoxing Ma, Jian Lu
{"title":"SynEva:通过镜像程序合成评估ML程序","authors":"Yi Qin, Huiyan Wang, Chang Xu, Xiaoxing Ma, Jian Lu","doi":"10.1109/QRS.2018.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) programs are being widely used in various human-related applications. However, their testing always remains to be a challenging problem, and one can hardly decide whether and how the existing knowledge extracted from training scenarios suit new scenarios. Existing approaches typically have restricted usages due to their assumptions on the availability of an oracle, comparable implementation, or manual inspection efforts. We solve this problem by proposing a novel program synthesis based approach, SynEva, that can systematically construct an oracle-alike mirror program for similarity measurement, and automatically compare it with the existing knowledge on new scenarios to decide how the knowledge suits the new scenarios. SynEva is lightweight and fully automated. Our experimental evaluation with real-world data sets validates SynEva's effectiveness by strong correlation and little overhead results. We expect that SynEva can apply to, and help evaluate, more ML programs for new scenarios.","PeriodicalId":114973,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SynEva: Evaluating ML Programs by Mirror Program Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Yi Qin, Huiyan Wang, Chang Xu, Xiaoxing Ma, Jian Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS.2018.00031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning (ML) programs are being widely used in various human-related applications. However, their testing always remains to be a challenging problem, and one can hardly decide whether and how the existing knowledge extracted from training scenarios suit new scenarios. Existing approaches typically have restricted usages due to their assumptions on the availability of an oracle, comparable implementation, or manual inspection efforts. We solve this problem by proposing a novel program synthesis based approach, SynEva, that can systematically construct an oracle-alike mirror program for similarity measurement, and automatically compare it with the existing knowledge on new scenarios to decide how the knowledge suits the new scenarios. SynEva is lightweight and fully automated. Our experimental evaluation with real-world data sets validates SynEva's effectiveness by strong correlation and little overhead results. We expect that SynEva can apply to, and help evaluate, more ML programs for new scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

机器学习(ML)程序被广泛应用于各种与人类相关的应用中。然而,它们的测试一直是一个具有挑战性的问题,人们很难确定从训练场景中提取的现有知识是否适用于新场景,以及如何适用于新场景。由于对oracle的可用性、可比较的实现或人工检查工作的假设,现有方法的使用通常受到限制。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种基于程序综合的新方法SynEva,该方法可以系统地构建类似于oracle的镜像程序进行相似性度量,并自动将其与新场景下的现有知识进行比较,以确定知识如何适合新场景。SynEva重量轻,完全自动化。我们对真实世界数据集的实验评估通过强相关性和小开销结果验证了SynEva的有效性。我们希望SynEva能够为新的场景申请并帮助评估更多的ML程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SynEva: Evaluating ML Programs by Mirror Program Synthesis
Machine learning (ML) programs are being widely used in various human-related applications. However, their testing always remains to be a challenging problem, and one can hardly decide whether and how the existing knowledge extracted from training scenarios suit new scenarios. Existing approaches typically have restricted usages due to their assumptions on the availability of an oracle, comparable implementation, or manual inspection efforts. We solve this problem by proposing a novel program synthesis based approach, SynEva, that can systematically construct an oracle-alike mirror program for similarity measurement, and automatically compare it with the existing knowledge on new scenarios to decide how the knowledge suits the new scenarios. SynEva is lightweight and fully automated. Our experimental evaluation with real-world data sets validates SynEva's effectiveness by strong correlation and little overhead results. We expect that SynEva can apply to, and help evaluate, more ML programs for new scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatically Repairing SQL Faults Using Crash Frequency Analysis to Identify Error-Prone Software Technologies in Multi-System Monitoring Target Selection for Test-Based Resource Adaptation The State of Practice on Virtual Reality (VR) Applications: An Exploratory Study on Github and Stack Overflow Detecting Errors in a Humanoid Robot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1