新生儿轻微生理异常与婴儿行为预测。

C Burg, D Hart, P Quinn, J Rapoport
{"title":"新生儿轻微生理异常与婴儿行为预测。","authors":"C Burg,&nbsp;D Hart,&nbsp;P Quinn,&nbsp;J Rapoport","doi":"10.1007/BF01538048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between a newborn score of minor physical anomalies (MPAs) and behavior at ages 1 and 2 was examined. From an initial screening population of 933, 63 high anomaly and 78 low anomaly infants were followed until age 2 by examiners blind for the newborn anomaly score. High anomaly infants were more likely to be temperamentally difficult as rated by parent interview and direct observation. A subgroup of six infants who were considered irritable at both ages 1 and 2 were all from the high anomaly group. However, there was little agreement between behavioral ratings across situations and over time, and there were no significant predictors of behavior problems at age 2 based on any newborn or 1-year measure. These results indicate that the newborn anomaly score by itself is unlikely to prove clinically useful in predicting preschool behavior problems for an unselected population. The usefulness of this measure for other, \"high-risk,\" populations remains to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":15139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia","volume":"8 4","pages":"427-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01538048","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newborn minor physical anomalies and prediction of infant behavior.\",\"authors\":\"C Burg,&nbsp;D Hart,&nbsp;P Quinn,&nbsp;J Rapoport\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF01538048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between a newborn score of minor physical anomalies (MPAs) and behavior at ages 1 and 2 was examined. From an initial screening population of 933, 63 high anomaly and 78 low anomaly infants were followed until age 2 by examiners blind for the newborn anomaly score. High anomaly infants were more likely to be temperamentally difficult as rated by parent interview and direct observation. A subgroup of six infants who were considered irritable at both ages 1 and 2 were all from the high anomaly group. However, there was little agreement between behavioral ratings across situations and over time, and there were no significant predictors of behavior problems at age 2 based on any newborn or 1-year measure. These results indicate that the newborn anomaly score by itself is unlikely to prove clinically useful in predicting preschool behavior problems for an unselected population. The usefulness of this measure for other, \\\"high-risk,\\\" populations remains to be explored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"427-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01538048\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

研究了1岁和2岁新生儿轻微生理异常(MPAs)评分与行为之间的关系。从最初的933名筛查人群中,63名高异常婴儿和78名低异常婴儿被盲检者随访至2岁,以获得新生儿异常评分。经家长访谈和直接观察,高异常儿更有可能出现气质障碍。在1岁和2岁时被认为易激惹的6个婴儿的亚组都来自高异常组。然而,在不同情况下和不同时间的行为评分之间几乎没有一致,并且根据任何新生儿或一岁的测量,没有明显的预测2岁时行为问题的因素。这些结果表明,新生儿异常评分本身不太可能证明在预测未选择人群的学龄前行为问题方面临床上有用。这一措施对其他“高风险”人群的有用性仍有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Newborn minor physical anomalies and prediction of infant behavior.

The relationship between a newborn score of minor physical anomalies (MPAs) and behavior at ages 1 and 2 was examined. From an initial screening population of 933, 63 high anomaly and 78 low anomaly infants were followed until age 2 by examiners blind for the newborn anomaly score. High anomaly infants were more likely to be temperamentally difficult as rated by parent interview and direct observation. A subgroup of six infants who were considered irritable at both ages 1 and 2 were all from the high anomaly group. However, there was little agreement between behavioral ratings across situations and over time, and there were no significant predictors of behavior problems at age 2 based on any newborn or 1-year measure. These results indicate that the newborn anomaly score by itself is unlikely to prove clinically useful in predicting preschool behavior problems for an unselected population. The usefulness of this measure for other, "high-risk," populations remains to be explored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Vocabulary processing and Pragmatic skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Cognitive processes among children with autism spectrum disorder Increasing Compliance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder During an Extracurricular Activity The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Teaching Pretend Play Skills in a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorders using Video Modelling: A Case Study Autism Spectrum Disorder Treatment Interventions in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives through an online parent survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1