动荡、赋权与边缘化群体:五种国际教育治理体系的比较分析

Alison Taysum, K. Arar
{"title":"动荡、赋权与边缘化群体:五种国际教育治理体系的比较分析","authors":"Alison Taysum, K. Arar","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter presents a comparative analysis of the English, Northern Irish, Arab Israeli, Trinidad and Tobago and the US cases. The focus is what we have learned from the research about: the relationships within Education Governance Systems to navigate turbulence; building capacity for empowering senior-level leaders to deliver on their manifestos and outstanding track records for school improvement; reducing the achievement gap between dominant groups and marginalised groups in International Governance Systems. The chapter identifies that all cases require participatory multi-stakeholder action to develop and support collaborative networked learning communities in practice. Such communities of and for practice need to Empower Young Societal Innovators for Equity and Renewal (EYSIER). Policy and Education Governance Systems have the potential to synthesise the best of what has been said and done in the past, with innovative ways of working by empowering networks of knowledge building and advocacy. These networks co-create opportunities for action learners to work together to describe intersectionalities of discrimination and begin to remove fear of discrimination and marginalisation from Education Governance Systems. From this position, senior-level leaders can work with their leaders, teachers, parents and students to optimise how learning about the self, and learning how to learn improves community education for all students and EYSIER.","PeriodicalId":314970,"journal":{"name":"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems","volume":"38 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turbulence, Empowerment, and Marginalised Groups: A comparative analysis of five International Education Governance Systems\",\"authors\":\"Alison Taysum, K. Arar\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThis chapter presents a comparative analysis of the English, Northern Irish, Arab Israeli, Trinidad and Tobago and the US cases. The focus is what we have learned from the research about: the relationships within Education Governance Systems to navigate turbulence; building capacity for empowering senior-level leaders to deliver on their manifestos and outstanding track records for school improvement; reducing the achievement gap between dominant groups and marginalised groups in International Governance Systems. The chapter identifies that all cases require participatory multi-stakeholder action to develop and support collaborative networked learning communities in practice. Such communities of and for practice need to Empower Young Societal Innovators for Equity and Renewal (EYSIER). Policy and Education Governance Systems have the potential to synthesise the best of what has been said and done in the past, with innovative ways of working by empowering networks of knowledge building and advocacy. These networks co-create opportunities for action learners to work together to describe intersectionalities of discrimination and begin to remove fear of discrimination and marginalisation from Education Governance Systems. From this position, senior-level leaders can work with their leaders, teachers, parents and students to optimise how learning about the self, and learning how to learn improves community education for all students and EYSIER.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章对英国、北爱尔兰、阿拉伯以色列、特立尼达和多巴哥以及美国的案例进行了比较分析。重点是我们从研究中学到的:教育治理系统内部的关系,以应对动荡;加强能力建设,使高层领导能够履行他们的宣言和改善学校的杰出记录;缩小主导群体和边缘化群体在国际治理体系中的成就差距。本章指出,所有案例都需要多方利益相关者的参与行动,以在实践中发展和支持协作网络化学习社区。这样的社区和实践需要授权青年社会创新者公平和更新(EYSIER)。政策和教育治理系统有潜力通过赋予知识建设和宣传网络权力,以创新的工作方式,综合过去所说和所做的最佳成果。这些网络共同为行动学习者创造了机会,使他们能够共同努力,描述歧视的交叉性,并开始从教育治理系统中消除对歧视和边缘化的恐惧。在这个职位上,高层领导可以与他们的领导、老师、家长和学生一起优化学习自我的方式,学习如何学习可以改善所有学生和EYSIER的社区教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Turbulence, Empowerment, and Marginalised Groups: A comparative analysis of five International Education Governance Systems
Abstract This chapter presents a comparative analysis of the English, Northern Irish, Arab Israeli, Trinidad and Tobago and the US cases. The focus is what we have learned from the research about: the relationships within Education Governance Systems to navigate turbulence; building capacity for empowering senior-level leaders to deliver on their manifestos and outstanding track records for school improvement; reducing the achievement gap between dominant groups and marginalised groups in International Governance Systems. The chapter identifies that all cases require participatory multi-stakeholder action to develop and support collaborative networked learning communities in practice. Such communities of and for practice need to Empower Young Societal Innovators for Equity and Renewal (EYSIER). Policy and Education Governance Systems have the potential to synthesise the best of what has been said and done in the past, with innovative ways of working by empowering networks of knowledge building and advocacy. These networks co-create opportunities for action learners to work together to describe intersectionalities of discrimination and begin to remove fear of discrimination and marginalisation from Education Governance Systems. From this position, senior-level leaders can work with their leaders, teachers, parents and students to optimise how learning about the self, and learning how to learn improves community education for all students and EYSIER.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turbulence in Efforts at Curriculum Renewal for Educational Equity: A Critical Analysis of a Primary Curriculum Review Exercise in Trinidad and Tobago The Turbulence Black, Asian, Minority Ethnicity Chief Executive Officers of Small, Medium and Empty MATs Face in England’s Education System; the Agency Index Prelims Turbulence, Empowerment, and Marginalised Groups: A comparative analysis of five International Education Governance Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1