资本市场自由化与审计师会计调整:来自准实验的证据

Yingwen Deng, Ole‐Kristian Hope, Cyndia Wang, Min Zhang
{"title":"资本市场自由化与审计师会计调整:来自准实验的证据","authors":"Yingwen Deng, Ole‐Kristian Hope, Cyndia Wang, Min Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3501952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a shock to the Chinese capital market and unique and detailed audit-adjustment data, this paper investigates the effect of a capital-market liberalization program on auditors’ adjustments to their clients’ financial reports. Employing difference-in-differences tests with propensity-score matching and firm fixed effects, we find that the capital-market liberalization induced by the implementation of the Shanghai - Hong Kong Stock Connect increases auditor prudence and leads to audit-adjustment changes stimulated by greater reputational and litigation risks for auditors. However, whereas the liberalization significantly decreases the frequency and magnitude of upward audit adjustments, its effect on the probability or magnitude of downward audit adjustments is largely conditional. Further evidence shows that the effect is more pronounced for companies with high trading volume from Hong Kong investors, audited by the largest audit firms, and with low financial transparency.","PeriodicalId":345692,"journal":{"name":"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal","volume":"127 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital-Market Liberalization and Auditors' Accounting Adjustments: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Yingwen Deng, Ole‐Kristian Hope, Cyndia Wang, Min Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3501952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a shock to the Chinese capital market and unique and detailed audit-adjustment data, this paper investigates the effect of a capital-market liberalization program on auditors’ adjustments to their clients’ financial reports. Employing difference-in-differences tests with propensity-score matching and firm fixed effects, we find that the capital-market liberalization induced by the implementation of the Shanghai - Hong Kong Stock Connect increases auditor prudence and leads to audit-adjustment changes stimulated by greater reputational and litigation risks for auditors. However, whereas the liberalization significantly decreases the frequency and magnitude of upward audit adjustments, its effect on the probability or magnitude of downward audit adjustments is largely conditional. Further evidence shows that the effect is more pronounced for companies with high trading volume from Hong Kong investors, audited by the largest audit firms, and with low financial transparency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal\",\"volume\":\"127 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文利用对中国资本市场的冲击和独特而详细的审计调整数据,研究了资本市场自由化计划对审计师调整客户财务报告的影响。采用倾向分数匹配和firm fixed效应的异中异检验,我们发现沪港通实施所导致的资本市场自由化增加了审计师的审慎性,并导致审计师因更大的声誉和诉讼风险而引发的审计调整变化。然而,尽管自由化显著降低了向上审计调整的频率和幅度,但其对向下审计调整的概率或幅度的影响在很大程度上是有条件的。进一步的证据表明,对于香港投资者交易量大、由最大的审计公司审计、财务透明度低的公司,这种影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capital-Market Liberalization and Auditors' Accounting Adjustments: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment
Using a shock to the Chinese capital market and unique and detailed audit-adjustment data, this paper investigates the effect of a capital-market liberalization program on auditors’ adjustments to their clients’ financial reports. Employing difference-in-differences tests with propensity-score matching and firm fixed effects, we find that the capital-market liberalization induced by the implementation of the Shanghai - Hong Kong Stock Connect increases auditor prudence and leads to audit-adjustment changes stimulated by greater reputational and litigation risks for auditors. However, whereas the liberalization significantly decreases the frequency and magnitude of upward audit adjustments, its effect on the probability or magnitude of downward audit adjustments is largely conditional. Further evidence shows that the effect is more pronounced for companies with high trading volume from Hong Kong investors, audited by the largest audit firms, and with low financial transparency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do American Voters Really Not Punish Overt Undemocratic Behavior at the Polls? Natural Experimental Evidence from the 2021 Insurrection of the U.S. Capitol Absolute versus Relative: Asymmetric Framing and Feedback in a Heterogeneous-Endowment Public Goods Game Improving Studies of Sensitive Topics Using Prior Evidence: A Unified Bayesian Framework for List Experiments Are More Children Better Than One? Evidence from a Lab Experiment of Decision Making Financial Vulnerability and Seeking Expert Advice: Evidence from a Survey Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1