{"title":"基于hypervolume的多目标排序与选择","authors":"J. Branke, Wen Zhang, Yang Tao","doi":"10.1109/WSC.2016.7822148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a myopic ranking and selection procedures for the multi-objective case. Whereas most publications for multi-objective problems aim at maximizing the probability of correctly selecting all Pareto optimal solutions, we suggest minimizing the difference in hypervolume between the observed means of the perceived Pareto front and the true Pareto front as a new performance measure. We argue that this hypervolume difference is often more relevant for a decision maker. Empirical tests show that the proposed method performs well with respect to the stated hypervolume objective.","PeriodicalId":367269,"journal":{"name":"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","volume":"88 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multio-bjective ranking and selection based on hypervolume\",\"authors\":\"J. Branke, Wen Zhang, Yang Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WSC.2016.7822148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a myopic ranking and selection procedures for the multi-objective case. Whereas most publications for multi-objective problems aim at maximizing the probability of correctly selecting all Pareto optimal solutions, we suggest minimizing the difference in hypervolume between the observed means of the perceived Pareto front and the true Pareto front as a new performance measure. We argue that this hypervolume difference is often more relevant for a decision maker. Empirical tests show that the proposed method performs well with respect to the stated hypervolume objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"volume\":\"88 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2016.7822148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2016.7822148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multio-bjective ranking and selection based on hypervolume
In this paper, we propose a myopic ranking and selection procedures for the multi-objective case. Whereas most publications for multi-objective problems aim at maximizing the probability of correctly selecting all Pareto optimal solutions, we suggest minimizing the difference in hypervolume between the observed means of the perceived Pareto front and the true Pareto front as a new performance measure. We argue that this hypervolume difference is often more relevant for a decision maker. Empirical tests show that the proposed method performs well with respect to the stated hypervolume objective.