神话,小说,历史:对古代小说的"现实主义"的贡献

S. Tilg
{"title":"神话,小说,历史:对古代小说的\"现实主义\"的贡献","authors":"S. Tilg","doi":"10.5167/UZH-39647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I argue that the description of literary narrative in ancient rhetoric could have provided Greek and Roman novelists with a critical vocabulary, and that this vocabulary is reflected in their works. The major category by or against which novelists define their writing turns out to be μῦθος / fabula , which implies the idea of an unreal and unlikely narrative. I analyze the most significant passages and conclude that the first novels, which were posing as history, avoided looking unreal and unlikely, while later novelists were free to play with the concept of μῦθος / fabula on an individual basis. Given that exactly the Roman novels (and Achilles Tatius) are most defined by μῦθος / fabula , my result also questions our modern critical vocabulary according to which these novels are often called ‘realistic’. Stefan Tilg holds an Ambizione scholarship of the Swiss National Science Foundation and is hosted by the Klassisch-Philologisches Seminar of the University of Zurich. He is the author of Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel (Oxford 2010) and is currently writing a monograph on Apuleius’ Metamorphoses .","PeriodicalId":193009,"journal":{"name":"Ancient narrative","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mythos, Fiktion, Geschichte: Ein Beitrag zum 'Realismus' der antiken Romane\",\"authors\":\"S. Tilg\",\"doi\":\"10.5167/UZH-39647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I argue that the description of literary narrative in ancient rhetoric could have provided Greek and Roman novelists with a critical vocabulary, and that this vocabulary is reflected in their works. The major category by or against which novelists define their writing turns out to be μῦθος / fabula , which implies the idea of an unreal and unlikely narrative. I analyze the most significant passages and conclude that the first novels, which were posing as history, avoided looking unreal and unlikely, while later novelists were free to play with the concept of μῦθος / fabula on an individual basis. Given that exactly the Roman novels (and Achilles Tatius) are most defined by μῦθος / fabula , my result also questions our modern critical vocabulary according to which these novels are often called ‘realistic’. Stefan Tilg holds an Ambizione scholarship of the Swiss National Science Foundation and is hosted by the Klassisch-Philologisches Seminar of the University of Zurich. He is the author of Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel (Oxford 2010) and is currently writing a monograph on Apuleius’ Metamorphoses .\",\"PeriodicalId\":193009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ancient narrative\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ancient narrative\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-39647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-39647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,古代修辞学对文学叙事的描述可以为希腊和罗马小说家提供一种批判性词汇,这种词汇在他们的作品中得到反映。小说家定义其作品的主要类别是μ ο ος / fabula,这意味着一种不真实和不可能的叙事。我分析了最重要的段落,得出的结论是,作为历史的第一部小说避免了看起来不真实和不太可能,而后来的小说家则可以自由地在个人基础上玩μ ο ος / fabula的概念。考虑到罗马小说(以及阿基里斯·塔提乌斯)的大部分定义都是由μ ο θος / fabula定义的,我的结果也质疑了我们现代的批评词汇,根据这些词汇,这些小说通常被称为“现实主义”。Stefan Tilg拥有瑞士国家科学基金会Ambizione奖学金,并由苏黎世大学古典语言学研讨会主持。他是《爱欲的查里顿》和《希腊爱情小说的发明》(牛津2010)的作者,目前正在撰写关于阿普列夫斯的《变形记》的专著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mythos, Fiktion, Geschichte: Ein Beitrag zum 'Realismus' der antiken Romane
In this paper I argue that the description of literary narrative in ancient rhetoric could have provided Greek and Roman novelists with a critical vocabulary, and that this vocabulary is reflected in their works. The major category by or against which novelists define their writing turns out to be μῦθος / fabula , which implies the idea of an unreal and unlikely narrative. I analyze the most significant passages and conclude that the first novels, which were posing as history, avoided looking unreal and unlikely, while later novelists were free to play with the concept of μῦθος / fabula on an individual basis. Given that exactly the Roman novels (and Achilles Tatius) are most defined by μῦθος / fabula , my result also questions our modern critical vocabulary according to which these novels are often called ‘realistic’. Stefan Tilg holds an Ambizione scholarship of the Swiss National Science Foundation and is hosted by the Klassisch-Philologisches Seminar of the University of Zurich. He is the author of Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel (Oxford 2010) and is currently writing a monograph on Apuleius’ Metamorphoses .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il Nilo e Mosè: dalla Vita di Mosè di Filone alle Etiopiche di Eliodoro On Psyche and Psychology: A Reflection Embarquer pour l’Inde, un motif narratif chez Xénophon d’Éphèse, Lucien et Philostrate All’s Well that Ends Well? A Reflection Philostratus, the cup of Tantalus and the bowl of Buddha
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1