关于系统生成pin的可记忆性:分块有帮助吗?

J. Huh, Hyoungshick Kim, R. Bobba, Masooda N. Bashir, K. Beznosov
{"title":"关于系统生成pin的可记忆性:分块有帮助吗?","authors":"J. Huh, Hyoungshick Kim, R. Bobba, Masooda N. Bashir, K. Beznosov","doi":"10.5072/ZENODO.309748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To ensure that users do not choose weak personal identification numbers (PINs), many banks give out systemgenerated random PINs. 4-digit is the most commonly used PIN length, but 6-digit system-generated PINs are also becoming popular. The increased security we get from using system-generated PINs, however, comes at the cost of memorability. And while banks are increasingly adopting systemgenerated PINs, the impact on memorability of such PINs has not been studied. We conducted a large-scale online user study with 9,114 participants to investigate the impact of increased PIN length on the memorability of PINs, and whether number chunking 1 techniques (breaking a single number into multiple smaller numbers) can be applied to improve memorability for larger PIN lengths. As one would expect, our study shows that system-generated 4-digit PINs outperform 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs in long-term memorability. Interestingly, however, we find that there is no statistically significant difference in memorability between 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs, indicating that 7-, and 8-digit PINs should also be considered when looking to increase PIN length to 6-digits from currently common length of 4-digits for improved security. By grouping all 6-, 7-, and 8-digit chunked PINs together, and comparing them against a group of all non-chunked PINs, we find that chunking, overall, improves memorability of system-generated PINs. To our surprise, however, none of the individual chunking policies (e.g., 0000-00-00) showed statistically significant improvement over their peer non� Part of this work was done while Dr. Huh and Dr. Bobba were at the University of Illinois. 1 Note that our notion of chunking differs from the traditional notion in that we do not chunk numbers into semantically meaningful pieces.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?\",\"authors\":\"J. Huh, Hyoungshick Kim, R. Bobba, Masooda N. Bashir, K. Beznosov\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ZENODO.309748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To ensure that users do not choose weak personal identification numbers (PINs), many banks give out systemgenerated random PINs. 4-digit is the most commonly used PIN length, but 6-digit system-generated PINs are also becoming popular. The increased security we get from using system-generated PINs, however, comes at the cost of memorability. And while banks are increasingly adopting systemgenerated PINs, the impact on memorability of such PINs has not been studied. We conducted a large-scale online user study with 9,114 participants to investigate the impact of increased PIN length on the memorability of PINs, and whether number chunking 1 techniques (breaking a single number into multiple smaller numbers) can be applied to improve memorability for larger PIN lengths. As one would expect, our study shows that system-generated 4-digit PINs outperform 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs in long-term memorability. Interestingly, however, we find that there is no statistically significant difference in memorability between 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs, indicating that 7-, and 8-digit PINs should also be considered when looking to increase PIN length to 6-digits from currently common length of 4-digits for improved security. By grouping all 6-, 7-, and 8-digit chunked PINs together, and comparing them against a group of all non-chunked PINs, we find that chunking, overall, improves memorability of system-generated PINs. To our surprise, however, none of the individual chunking policies (e.g., 0000-00-00) showed statistically significant improvement over their peer non� Part of this work was done while Dr. Huh and Dr. Bobba were at the University of Illinois. 1 Note that our notion of chunking differs from the traditional notion in that we do not chunk numbers into semantically meaningful pieces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ZENODO.309748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ZENODO.309748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

为了确保用户不会选择弱个人识别号码(pin),许多银行提供系统生成的随机pin。4位是最常用的PIN长度,但6位系统生成的PIN也越来越流行。然而,使用系统生成的pin所增加的安全性是以可记忆性为代价的。虽然银行越来越多地采用系统生成的密码,但这些密码对可记忆性的影响尚未得到研究。我们进行了一项有9114名参与者的大规模在线用户研究,以调查增加PIN长度对PIN可记忆性的影响,以及数字分块技术(将单个数字分解成多个较小的数字)是否可以应用于提高较大PIN长度的可记忆性。正如人们所期望的那样,我们的研究表明,系统生成的4位pin在长期记忆性方面优于6位、7位和8位pin。然而,有趣的是,我们发现6位、7位和8位PIN在可记忆性方面没有统计学上的显著差异,这表明在寻求将PIN长度从目前常见的4位长度增加到6位以提高安全性时,也应该考虑7位和8位PIN。通过将所有6位、7位和8位分块pin分组在一起,并将它们与一组所有非分块pin进行比较,我们发现分块总体上提高了系统生成pin的可记忆性。然而,令我们惊讶的是,没有一个单独的分块策略(例如,0000-00-00)在统计上比他们的同行表现出显著的改善。这项工作的一部分是在Huh博士和Bobba博士在伊利诺伊大学完成的。注意,我们的分块概念不同于传统的概念,因为我们不把数字分成语义上有意义的片段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
To ensure that users do not choose weak personal identification numbers (PINs), many banks give out systemgenerated random PINs. 4-digit is the most commonly used PIN length, but 6-digit system-generated PINs are also becoming popular. The increased security we get from using system-generated PINs, however, comes at the cost of memorability. And while banks are increasingly adopting systemgenerated PINs, the impact on memorability of such PINs has not been studied. We conducted a large-scale online user study with 9,114 participants to investigate the impact of increased PIN length on the memorability of PINs, and whether number chunking 1 techniques (breaking a single number into multiple smaller numbers) can be applied to improve memorability for larger PIN lengths. As one would expect, our study shows that system-generated 4-digit PINs outperform 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs in long-term memorability. Interestingly, however, we find that there is no statistically significant difference in memorability between 6-, 7-, and 8-digit PINs, indicating that 7-, and 8-digit PINs should also be considered when looking to increase PIN length to 6-digits from currently common length of 4-digits for improved security. By grouping all 6-, 7-, and 8-digit chunked PINs together, and comparing them against a group of all non-chunked PINs, we find that chunking, overall, improves memorability of system-generated PINs. To our surprise, however, none of the individual chunking policies (e.g., 0000-00-00) showed statistically significant improvement over their peer non� Part of this work was done while Dr. Huh and Dr. Bobba were at the University of Illinois. 1 Note that our notion of chunking differs from the traditional notion in that we do not chunk numbers into semantically meaningful pieces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Is Reporting Worth the Sacrifice of Revealing What I Have Sent?": Privacy Considerations When Reporting on End-to-End Encrypted Platforms Iterative Design of An Accessible Crypto Wallet for Blind Users Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1