早期软件缺陷预测与预测准确性之间的权衡

L. Alhazzaa, Anneliese Amschler Andrews
{"title":"早期软件缺陷预测与预测准确性之间的权衡","authors":"L. Alhazzaa, Anneliese Amschler Andrews","doi":"10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In any software development organization, reliability is crucial. Defect prediction is key in providing management with the tools for release planning. To predict defects we ask the question of how much data is required to make usable predictions? When testing, a rule of thumb is to start defect prediction after 60% of system test has been accomplished. In an operational phase, managers cannot usually determine what constitutes 60% of a release and might not want to wait that long to start defect prediction. Here we discuss the trade-offs between the need of early predictions versus making more accurate predictions.","PeriodicalId":103662,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade-Offs between Early Software Defect Prediction versus Prediction Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"L. Alhazzaa, Anneliese Amschler Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In any software development organization, reliability is crucial. Defect prediction is key in providing management with the tools for release planning. To predict defects we ask the question of how much data is required to make usable predictions? When testing, a rule of thumb is to start defect prediction after 60% of system test has been accomplished. In an operational phase, managers cannot usually determine what constitutes 60% of a release and might not want to wait that long to start defect prediction. Here we discuss the trade-offs between the need of early predictions versus making more accurate predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在任何软件开发组织中,可靠性是至关重要的。缺陷预测是为发布计划提供管理工具的关键。为了预测缺陷,我们会问需要多少数据才能做出可用的预测?当测试时,经验法则是在60%的系统测试完成后开始缺陷预测。在操作阶段,管理人员通常不能确定什么构成了发布的60%,并且可能不想等待那么长时间来开始缺陷预测。在这里,我们将讨论早期预测需求与做出更准确预测之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trade-Offs between Early Software Defect Prediction versus Prediction Accuracy
In any software development organization, reliability is crucial. Defect prediction is key in providing management with the tools for release planning. To predict defects we ask the question of how much data is required to make usable predictions? When testing, a rule of thumb is to start defect prediction after 60% of system test has been accomplished. In an operational phase, managers cannot usually determine what constitutes 60% of a release and might not want to wait that long to start defect prediction. Here we discuss the trade-offs between the need of early predictions versus making more accurate predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temperature Prediction Based on Long Short Term Memory Networks Extending a Soft-Core RISC-V Processor to Accelerate CNN Inference Uncovering Los Angeles Tourists' Patterns Using Geospatial Analysis and Supervised Machine Learning with Random Forest Predictors A Framework for Leveraging Business Intelligence to Manage Transactional Data Flows between Private Healthcare Providers and Medical Aid Administrators Feasibility Study of a Consumer Multi-Sensory Wristband to Monitor Sleep Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1