GOMS-TLM与眼动追踪方法在用户界面交互速度评估任务中的比较

V. Kompaniets, A. Kazanskaya, A. Tselykh, Valery Grigoryev
{"title":"GOMS-TLM与眼动追踪方法在用户界面交互速度评估任务中的比较","authors":"V. Kompaniets, A. Kazanskaya, A. Tselykh, Valery Grigoryev","doi":"10.1109/AICT50176.2020.9368590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes a part of the ergonomic study of a mobile application user interface. It briefly presents the methodological review of the study, based on the of Schneiderman. This assessment was expanded by the GOMS-TLM method adapted for touch input and the eye tracking procedure on Tribe Eye Tracking equipment in the task of assessing the speed of a user interaction with an application. It has been demonstrated that the actual speed of the user, who is interacting with the test application for the first time, measured in eye tracking, is, on average, significantly lower than the prediction received by the GOMS-TLM method. It is higher the prediction for users familiar with the interface, however. Thus, in the work it was concluded that the GOMS-TLM method can give acceptable results that do not contradict the empirical oculographic experiment with minimal resource expenditure","PeriodicalId":136491,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GOMS-TLM and Eye Tracking Methods Comparison in the User Interface Interaction Speed Assessing Task\",\"authors\":\"V. Kompaniets, A. Kazanskaya, A. Tselykh, Valery Grigoryev\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AICT50176.2020.9368590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes a part of the ergonomic study of a mobile application user interface. It briefly presents the methodological review of the study, based on the of Schneiderman. This assessment was expanded by the GOMS-TLM method adapted for touch input and the eye tracking procedure on Tribe Eye Tracking equipment in the task of assessing the speed of a user interaction with an application. It has been demonstrated that the actual speed of the user, who is interacting with the test application for the first time, measured in eye tracking, is, on average, significantly lower than the prediction received by the GOMS-TLM method. It is higher the prediction for users familiar with the interface, however. Thus, in the work it was concluded that the GOMS-TLM method can give acceptable results that do not contradict the empirical oculographic experiment with minimal resource expenditure\",\"PeriodicalId\":136491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT50176.2020.9368590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT50176.2020.9368590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了一个移动应用程序用户界面的部分人机工程学研究。本文简要介绍了基于施奈德曼理论的研究方法综述。这项评估通过适用于触摸输入的GOMS-TLM方法和Tribe eye tracking设备上的眼动追踪程序来扩展,以评估用户与应用程序的交互速度。研究表明,眼动追踪测量的用户第一次与测试应用程序交互的实际速度平均显著低于GOMS-TLM方法的预测结果。然而,对于熟悉界面的用户来说,预测值更高。因此,在工作中得出结论,GOMS-TLM方法可以给出可接受的结果,并且与经验眼科实验不矛盾,资源消耗最小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GOMS-TLM and Eye Tracking Methods Comparison in the User Interface Interaction Speed Assessing Task
The article describes a part of the ergonomic study of a mobile application user interface. It briefly presents the methodological review of the study, based on the of Schneiderman. This assessment was expanded by the GOMS-TLM method adapted for touch input and the eye tracking procedure on Tribe Eye Tracking equipment in the task of assessing the speed of a user interaction with an application. It has been demonstrated that the actual speed of the user, who is interacting with the test application for the first time, measured in eye tracking, is, on average, significantly lower than the prediction received by the GOMS-TLM method. It is higher the prediction for users familiar with the interface, however. Thus, in the work it was concluded that the GOMS-TLM method can give acceptable results that do not contradict the empirical oculographic experiment with minimal resource expenditure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockchain-based open infrastructure for URL filtering in an Internet browser 2D Amplitude-Only Microwave Tomography Algorithm for Breast-Cancer Detection Information Extraction from Arabic Law Documents An Experimental Design Approach to Analyse the Performance of Island-Based Parallel Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Automation Check Vulnerabilities Of Access Points Based On 802.11 Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1