{"title":"左心室辅助装置作为D期心力衰竭的目的治疗","authors":"R. Asleh, Sarah Schettle, F. Khan, S. Kushwaha","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in stage D heart failure\",\"authors\":\"R. Asleh, Sarah Schettle, F. Khan, S. Kushwaha\",\"doi\":\"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are\",\"PeriodicalId\":285674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
机械循环支持(MCS)日益成为D期心力衰竭(HF)患者重要的治疗机会,对患者的生存和生活质量有显著影响。早期临床试验表明,与最佳医疗管理相比,持久左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持改善了结果。随着技术的进步,连续流lvad在临床试验中的表现优于脉动流装置,由于其临床优势,该领域转移到HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL)和HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN)设备。在连续流装置中,轴流和离心的磁悬浮装置随后在临床试验中进行了研究,并取得了很好的结果。与第一代搏动式HeartMate XVE LVAD的54%生存率相比,第二代轴流式HeartMate II和第三代离心式HeartMate III LVAD在LVAD植入后随访两年,生存率分别提高到76%和83%。此外,微创手术作为胸骨切开术放置器械的替代方法,如侧胸切开术,已被探索以改善术后恢复和长期预后。目前,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的设备包括轴流HeartMate II,离心流与被动磁浮设计的HeartWare,和离心流与完全磁浮设计的HeartMate III。所有这些设备都是FDA批准的,适用于在等待心脏移植(HT)[桥式移植(BTT)]期间使用LVAD支持的患者以及正在等待心脏移植的患者
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in stage D heart failure
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are