开发银行和辛迪加结构:来自世界样本的证据

Marta Degl'Innocenti, Marco Frigerio, Si Zhou
{"title":"开发银行和辛迪加结构:来自世界样本的证据","authors":"Marta Degl'Innocenti, Marco Frigerio, Si Zhou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3615477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do development banks influence the syndicate structure? Using a global dataset of 12,322 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016 across 78 countries, we show that the lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structure in mixed syndicates including both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Finally, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate among the others.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Banks and the Syndicate Structure: Evidence From a World Sample\",\"authors\":\"Marta Degl'Innocenti, Marco Frigerio, Si Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3615477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Do development banks influence the syndicate structure? Using a global dataset of 12,322 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016 across 78 countries, we show that the lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structure in mixed syndicates including both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Finally, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate among the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3615477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3615477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

开发银行对银团结构有影响吗?利用2001年至2016年78个国家12,322笔银团贷款的全球数据集,我们发现,在包括开发银行和私营银行作为参与者的混合银团中,牵头银行的贷款份额减少,结构集中度降低。与社会对开发银行作用的看法一致,我们发现这种影响在金融不稳定时期更为强烈,特别是对于绿色产业和资金受限的借款人。相反,我们没有发现任何证据表明混合辛迪加在政治扭曲方面表现出不同的辛迪加结构。最后,我们发现混合辛迪加与更高的契约违约和贷款发起后借款人风险状况的增加无关。当考虑到关系贷款、银团内部的信息不对称、贷款人的贷款专业知识、借款人的不透明度、贷款类型以及银团中的排名等级等因素时,我们的结果是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development Banks and the Syndicate Structure: Evidence From a World Sample
Do development banks influence the syndicate structure? Using a global dataset of 12,322 syndicated loans from 2001 to 2016 across 78 countries, we show that the lead banks decrease their loan shares and form less concentrated structure in mixed syndicates including both development banks and private-sector banks as participant lenders. In line with the social view on the role of development banks, we find that such an effect is stronger during periods of financial instability, particularly for the green industry and in the case of borrowers that are financially constrained. Conversely, we do not find any evidence that mixed syndicates exhibit a different syndicate structure for political distortions. Finally, we find that mixed syndicates are not associated with higher covenant violations and increasing of the borrowers’ risk profile after the loan origination. Our results are robust when accounting for relationship lending, asymmetric information within the syndicate, lenders’ lending expertise, borrowers’ opacity, types of loan, and ranking hierarchy in the syndicate among the others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed Hype Cycles: Dynamic Information Design with Two Audiences A Mechanism and Matching in a Social Dilemma The quasi-sorting equilibrium and incentive effects in parallel contests with multiple types of players Competition and Selection in Credit Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1