远程监控中选定可穿戴设备的距离测量评估

Zachary Schneider, J. Shahbazian, S. Krishnan
{"title":"远程监控中选定可穿戴设备的距离测量评估","authors":"Zachary Schneider, J. Shahbazian, S. Krishnan","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.2016.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of wearable devices in health applications is not only being utilized in illness, it is also a major area of interest in fitness. Wearable devices for fitness tracking are available to consumers and can measure and calculate important fitness data trends based on movement and physiological parameters. Accelerometers are the sensors that provide information on the movement parameters of step count and distance. It is understood to obtain a distance measurement, there must be information provided about the step-to-step length but these devices typically only measure step count, and do provide the step-to-step length. The step-to-step length is based on the user's height which is input into the settings, allowing for the calculation of the distance. The intention of this study is to introduce a preliminary experiment to evaluate two different devices -- the Fitbit Flex and the Polar Loop -- for distance measurement methods, based on the step-to-step length values determined from collected device data. One measurement method uses a default stride length while the other method uses a stride speed algorithm. The step-to-step values for each device were compared to an experimental ground truth value for accuracy, which was used as a pilot for comparing the initial device data. In this preliminary study, the default stride length method provided a more accurate method for measuring the distance. A subsequent study is expected to be performed with more participants and parameters, which will be more suitable for providing a better comparison between the two devices against a ground truth.","PeriodicalId":196856,"journal":{"name":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Distance Measurement with Selected Wearable Devices in Telemonitoring\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Schneider, J. Shahbazian, S. Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBEC.2016.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of wearable devices in health applications is not only being utilized in illness, it is also a major area of interest in fitness. Wearable devices for fitness tracking are available to consumers and can measure and calculate important fitness data trends based on movement and physiological parameters. Accelerometers are the sensors that provide information on the movement parameters of step count and distance. It is understood to obtain a distance measurement, there must be information provided about the step-to-step length but these devices typically only measure step count, and do provide the step-to-step length. The step-to-step length is based on the user's height which is input into the settings, allowing for the calculation of the distance. The intention of this study is to introduce a preliminary experiment to evaluate two different devices -- the Fitbit Flex and the Polar Loop -- for distance measurement methods, based on the step-to-step length values determined from collected device data. One measurement method uses a default stride length while the other method uses a stride speed algorithm. The step-to-step values for each device were compared to an experimental ground truth value for accuracy, which was used as a pilot for comparing the initial device data. In this preliminary study, the default stride length method provided a more accurate method for measuring the distance. A subsequent study is expected to be performed with more participants and parameters, which will be more suitable for providing a better comparison between the two devices against a ground truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.2016.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.2016.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在健康应用中使用可穿戴设备不仅用于治疗疾病,它也是健身的一个主要兴趣领域。消费者可以使用可穿戴健身跟踪设备,可以根据运动和生理参数测量和计算重要的健身数据趋势。加速度计是提供步数和距离等运动参数信息的传感器。可以理解,为了获得距离测量,必须提供有关步长的信息,但这些设备通常仅测量步数,并且确实提供步长。步长是基于用户的高度输入到设置中,允许计算距离。本研究的目的是介绍一个初步的实验,以评估两种不同的设备——Fitbit Flex和Polar Loop——用于距离测量方法,基于从收集的设备数据确定的步长值。一种测量方法使用默认步幅长度,而另一种方法使用步幅速度算法。为了准确性,将每个设备的逐级值与实验接地真值进行比较,该值用作比较初始设备数据的先导。在本初步研究中,默认步幅法为测量距离提供了更准确的方法。后续的研究预计将有更多的参与者和参数进行,这将更适合于在两种设备之间提供更好的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Distance Measurement with Selected Wearable Devices in Telemonitoring
The use of wearable devices in health applications is not only being utilized in illness, it is also a major area of interest in fitness. Wearable devices for fitness tracking are available to consumers and can measure and calculate important fitness data trends based on movement and physiological parameters. Accelerometers are the sensors that provide information on the movement parameters of step count and distance. It is understood to obtain a distance measurement, there must be information provided about the step-to-step length but these devices typically only measure step count, and do provide the step-to-step length. The step-to-step length is based on the user's height which is input into the settings, allowing for the calculation of the distance. The intention of this study is to introduce a preliminary experiment to evaluate two different devices -- the Fitbit Flex and the Polar Loop -- for distance measurement methods, based on the step-to-step length values determined from collected device data. One measurement method uses a default stride length while the other method uses a stride speed algorithm. The step-to-step values for each device were compared to an experimental ground truth value for accuracy, which was used as a pilot for comparing the initial device data. In this preliminary study, the default stride length method provided a more accurate method for measuring the distance. A subsequent study is expected to be performed with more participants and parameters, which will be more suitable for providing a better comparison between the two devices against a ground truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Inhibition of Bio-film Formation by Graphene-Modified Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection: A Comparative Study Novel Scalable Nano-and Micro-High-Aspect Ratio Structure (HARS) Biocomposites Generated under Physiological Conditions Thermal Management System for In Vitro Evalution of Circulatory Assist Devices at In Vivo Temperatures Distinguishing Motor Imagery from Motor Movement Using Phase Locking Value and Eigenvector Centrality Spin Coating of 3D Printed Cardiovascular Anatomical Models, Controlling Material Properties on Complex Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1