分权和收入不平等在一个小组和国家的横截面

ERN: National Pub Date : 2019-09-12 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3452512
Tristan Canare, J. P. Francisco, R. A. C. Caliso
{"title":"分权和收入不平等在一个小组和国家的横截面","authors":"Tristan Canare, J. P. Francisco, R. A. C. Caliso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3452512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralization had been a common public finance reform among developing countries in the past few decades. Some advocates pushed for decentralization reform as an answer to the growing problem of income inequality. The primary argument for decentralization was that sub-national governments had better information on the needs and preferences of local citizens; while the primary argument against it was that the central government had better economies of scale in delivering public services, and usually had better access to important resources. This study tested for the relationship between decentralization and income inequality using both panel data and an annual averaged cross-section data of countries with varying income levels. The results showed that revenue decentralization and fiscal independence were weakly associated with lower income inequality, while expenditure decentralization had no significant relationship with inequality. In addition, the relationship appeared only in the panel data analysis, i.e. when short-term yearly fluctuations in data was not controlled for.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralization and Income Inequality in a Panel and Cross-Section of Countries\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Canare, J. P. Francisco, R. A. C. Caliso\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3452512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decentralization had been a common public finance reform among developing countries in the past few decades. Some advocates pushed for decentralization reform as an answer to the growing problem of income inequality. The primary argument for decentralization was that sub-national governments had better information on the needs and preferences of local citizens; while the primary argument against it was that the central government had better economies of scale in delivering public services, and usually had better access to important resources. This study tested for the relationship between decentralization and income inequality using both panel data and an annual averaged cross-section data of countries with varying income levels. The results showed that revenue decentralization and fiscal independence were weakly associated with lower income inequality, while expenditure decentralization had no significant relationship with inequality. In addition, the relationship appeared only in the panel data analysis, i.e. when short-term yearly fluctuations in data was not controlled for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: National\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3452512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3452512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几十年里,权力下放一直是发展中国家共同的公共财政改革。一些倡导者推动权力下放改革,以解决日益严重的收入不平等问题。支持权力下放的主要理由是,地方政府对当地公民的需求和偏好有更好的了解;反对的主要理由是,中央政府在提供公共服务方面具有更好的规模经济效益,而且通常更容易获得重要资源。本研究使用面板数据和不同收入水平国家的年平均横截面数据来检验权力下放与收入不平等之间的关系。结果表明,收入分权和财政独立对收入不平等程度的影响较弱,而支出分权对收入不平等程度的影响不显著。此外,这种关系仅在面板数据分析中出现,即当数据的短期年度波动未得到控制时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decentralization and Income Inequality in a Panel and Cross-Section of Countries
Decentralization had been a common public finance reform among developing countries in the past few decades. Some advocates pushed for decentralization reform as an answer to the growing problem of income inequality. The primary argument for decentralization was that sub-national governments had better information on the needs and preferences of local citizens; while the primary argument against it was that the central government had better economies of scale in delivering public services, and usually had better access to important resources. This study tested for the relationship between decentralization and income inequality using both panel data and an annual averaged cross-section data of countries with varying income levels. The results showed that revenue decentralization and fiscal independence were weakly associated with lower income inequality, while expenditure decentralization had no significant relationship with inequality. In addition, the relationship appeared only in the panel data analysis, i.e. when short-term yearly fluctuations in data was not controlled for.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1