具有内生质量的政策工具选择:日本机场按乘客和按航班收费

Naoshi Doi
{"title":"具有内生质量的政策工具选择:日本机场按乘客和按航班收费","authors":"Naoshi Doi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3364019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study empirically investigates how two types of airport charges (per-passenger and per-flight) differentially affect airfares, service quality (flight frequency), and welfare. A structural model endogenizing airfares and flight frequency is estimated with data on Japanese domestic routes and then used for simulation analyses. The results reveal that per-passenger charges significantly raise airfares, with an average pass-through rate of 97.5 percent, and reduce flight frequency. Per-flight charges decrease flight frequency but have little effect on airfares. On nearly 80 percent of the routes in the sample, per-flight charges are socially preferred to per-passenger charges. The small portion (approximately 20 percent) of routes on which per-passenger charges are preferred include the largest routes. Consequently, per-passenger charges become socially preferred from the perspective of total surplus aggregated over all routes. It is also found that when flight frequency is treated as exogenous, the preferred form of charge could be reversed.","PeriodicalId":410291,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of Policy Instruments with Endogenous Quality: Per-passenger and Per-flight Airport Charges in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Naoshi Doi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3364019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study empirically investigates how two types of airport charges (per-passenger and per-flight) differentially affect airfares, service quality (flight frequency), and welfare. A structural model endogenizing airfares and flight frequency is estimated with data on Japanese domestic routes and then used for simulation analyses. The results reveal that per-passenger charges significantly raise airfares, with an average pass-through rate of 97.5 percent, and reduce flight frequency. Per-flight charges decrease flight frequency but have little effect on airfares. On nearly 80 percent of the routes in the sample, per-flight charges are socially preferred to per-passenger charges. The small portion (approximately 20 percent) of routes on which per-passenger charges are preferred include the largest routes. Consequently, per-passenger charges become socially preferred from the perspective of total surplus aggregated over all routes. It is also found that when flight frequency is treated as exogenous, the preferred form of charge could be reversed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3364019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3364019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究实证调查了机场收费的两种类型(每乘客和每航班)对机票价格、服务质量(航班频率)和福利的不同影响。利用日本国内航线的数据,估计了一个内因机票价格和航班频率的结构模型,并将其用于仿真分析。结果显示,人均收费显著提高了机票价格,平均通过率为97.5%,并减少了航班频率。单次收费降低了航班频率,但对机票价格影响不大。在样本中近80%的航线上,按航班收费比按乘客收费更受社会青睐。按乘客收费的一小部分(约20%)路线包括最大的路线。因此,从所有路线的总盈余来看,每乘客收费成为社会首选。研究还发现,当飞行频率被视为外生时,首选的电荷形式可以被逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choice of Policy Instruments with Endogenous Quality: Per-passenger and Per-flight Airport Charges in Japan
This study empirically investigates how two types of airport charges (per-passenger and per-flight) differentially affect airfares, service quality (flight frequency), and welfare. A structural model endogenizing airfares and flight frequency is estimated with data on Japanese domestic routes and then used for simulation analyses. The results reveal that per-passenger charges significantly raise airfares, with an average pass-through rate of 97.5 percent, and reduce flight frequency. Per-flight charges decrease flight frequency but have little effect on airfares. On nearly 80 percent of the routes in the sample, per-flight charges are socially preferred to per-passenger charges. The small portion (approximately 20 percent) of routes on which per-passenger charges are preferred include the largest routes. Consequently, per-passenger charges become socially preferred from the perspective of total surplus aggregated over all routes. It is also found that when flight frequency is treated as exogenous, the preferred form of charge could be reversed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing City Size Distributions: Population vs. Economic Activity The Road to Integration: Post-Migration Experience and Migrant Housing Behavior in Singapore Regional Housing Market Conditions in Spain Evidence-based COVID-19 Response in Ethiopia: A quasi-Experimental Study on Social Distancing Industrial Structure and a Tradeoff between Productivity and Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1