基于协同进化分析识别克隆移除机会

Yoshiki Higo, S. Kusumoto
{"title":"基于协同进化分析识别克隆移除机会","authors":"Yoshiki Higo, S. Kusumoto","doi":"10.1145/2501543.2501552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research efforts have proposed various techniques for supporting code clone removal. They identify removal candidates based on the states of the source code in the latest version. However, those techniques suggest many code clones that are not suited for removal in addition to appropriate candidates. That is because the presence of code clones do not necessarily motivate developers to remove them if they are stable and do not require simultaneous modifications. In this paper, we propose a new technique that identifies removal candidates based on past records of code modifications. By using the proposed technique, we can identify code clones that actually required simultaneous modifications in the past.","PeriodicalId":321820,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying clone removal opportunities based on co-evolution analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiki Higo, S. Kusumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2501543.2501552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous research efforts have proposed various techniques for supporting code clone removal. They identify removal candidates based on the states of the source code in the latest version. However, those techniques suggest many code clones that are not suited for removal in addition to appropriate candidates. That is because the presence of code clones do not necessarily motivate developers to remove them if they are stable and do not require simultaneous modifications. In this paper, we propose a new technique that identifies removal candidates based on past records of code modifications. By using the proposed technique, we can identify code clones that actually required simultaneous modifications in the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501543.2501552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501543.2501552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

以前的研究工作已经提出了各种支持代码克隆移除的技术。它们根据最新版本中源代码的状态确定移除候选项。然而,除了合适的候选代码之外,这些技术还提出了许多不适合删除的代码克隆。这是因为如果代码克隆是稳定的并且不需要同时修改,那么它们的存在并不一定会促使开发人员删除它们。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于过去代码修改记录来识别移除候选项的新技术。通过使用建议的技术,我们可以识别在过去实际上需要同时修改的代码克隆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying clone removal opportunities based on co-evolution analysis
Previous research efforts have proposed various techniques for supporting code clone removal. They identify removal candidates based on the states of the source code in the latest version. However, those techniques suggest many code clones that are not suited for removal in addition to appropriate candidates. That is because the presence of code clones do not necessarily motivate developers to remove them if they are stable and do not require simultaneous modifications. In this paper, we propose a new technique that identifies removal candidates based on past records of code modifications. By using the proposed technique, we can identify code clones that actually required simultaneous modifications in the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying lehman's laws to game evolution Enhancement of CRD-based clone tracking Identifying clone removal opportunities based on co-evolution analysis What can commit metadata tell us about design degradation? Tracking performance failures with rizel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1