过拟合、鲁棒性和恶意算法:机器学习中隐私风险潜在原因的研究

Samuel Yeom, Irene Giacomelli, Alan Menaged, Matt Fredrikson, S. Jha
{"title":"过拟合、鲁棒性和恶意算法:机器学习中隐私风险潜在原因的研究","authors":"Samuel Yeom, Irene Giacomelli, Alan Menaged, Matt Fredrikson, S. Jha","doi":"10.3233/jcs-191362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Machine learning algorithms, when applied to sensitive data, pose a distinct threat to privacy. A growing body of prior work demonstrates that models produced by these algorithms may leak specific private information in the training data to an attacker, either through the models’ structure or their observable behavior. This article examines the factors that can allow a training set membership inference attacker or an attribute inference attacker to learn such information. Using both formal and empirical analyses, we illustrate a clear relationship between these factors and the privacy risk that arises in several popular machine learning algorithms. We find that overfitting is sufficient to allow an attacker to perform membership inference and, when the target attribute meets certain conditions about its influence, attribute inference attacks. We also explore the connection between membership inference and attribute inference, showing that there are deep connections between the two that lead to effective new attacks. We show that overfitting is not necessary for these attacks, demonstrating that other factors, such as robustness to norm-bounded input perturbations and malicious training algorithms, can also significantly increase the privacy risk. Notably, as robustness is intended to be a defense against attacks on the integrity of model predictions, these results suggest it may be difficult in some cases to simultaneously defend against privacy and integrity attacks.","PeriodicalId":142580,"journal":{"name":"J. Comput. Secur.","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overfitting, robustness, and malicious algorithms: A study of potential causes of privacy risk in machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Yeom, Irene Giacomelli, Alan Menaged, Matt Fredrikson, S. Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jcs-191362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Machine learning algorithms, when applied to sensitive data, pose a distinct threat to privacy. A growing body of prior work demonstrates that models produced by these algorithms may leak specific private information in the training data to an attacker, either through the models’ structure or their observable behavior. This article examines the factors that can allow a training set membership inference attacker or an attribute inference attacker to learn such information. Using both formal and empirical analyses, we illustrate a clear relationship between these factors and the privacy risk that arises in several popular machine learning algorithms. We find that overfitting is sufficient to allow an attacker to perform membership inference and, when the target attribute meets certain conditions about its influence, attribute inference attacks. We also explore the connection between membership inference and attribute inference, showing that there are deep connections between the two that lead to effective new attacks. We show that overfitting is not necessary for these attacks, demonstrating that other factors, such as robustness to norm-bounded input perturbations and malicious training algorithms, can also significantly increase the privacy risk. Notably, as robustness is intended to be a defense against attacks on the integrity of model predictions, these results suggest it may be difficult in some cases to simultaneously defend against privacy and integrity attacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Comput. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Comput. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcs-191362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Comput. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcs-191362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

. 当机器学习算法应用于敏感数据时,对隐私构成了明显的威胁。越来越多的先前工作表明,由这些算法产生的模型可能会通过模型的结构或其可观察的行为将训练数据中的特定私人信息泄露给攻击者。本文研究了允许训练集成员推理攻击者或属性推理攻击者学习此类信息的因素。使用正式和实证分析,我们说明了这些因素与几种流行的机器学习算法中出现的隐私风险之间的明确关系。我们发现,过拟合足以允许攻击者进行隶属度推理,当目标属性满足其影响的一定条件时,进行属性推理攻击。我们还探讨了隶属推理和属性推理之间的联系,表明两者之间存在深刻的联系,导致有效的新攻击。我们表明过拟合对于这些攻击是不必要的,这表明其他因素,如对范数有界输入扰动的鲁棒性和恶意训练算法,也会显著增加隐私风险。值得注意的是,由于鲁棒性旨在防御对模型预测完整性的攻击,这些结果表明,在某些情况下,同时防御隐私和完整性攻击可能很困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overfitting, robustness, and malicious algorithms: A study of potential causes of privacy risk in machine learning
. Machine learning algorithms, when applied to sensitive data, pose a distinct threat to privacy. A growing body of prior work demonstrates that models produced by these algorithms may leak specific private information in the training data to an attacker, either through the models’ structure or their observable behavior. This article examines the factors that can allow a training set membership inference attacker or an attribute inference attacker to learn such information. Using both formal and empirical analyses, we illustrate a clear relationship between these factors and the privacy risk that arises in several popular machine learning algorithms. We find that overfitting is sufficient to allow an attacker to perform membership inference and, when the target attribute meets certain conditions about its influence, attribute inference attacks. We also explore the connection between membership inference and attribute inference, showing that there are deep connections between the two that lead to effective new attacks. We show that overfitting is not necessary for these attacks, demonstrating that other factors, such as robustness to norm-bounded input perturbations and malicious training algorithms, can also significantly increase the privacy risk. Notably, as robustness is intended to be a defense against attacks on the integrity of model predictions, these results suggest it may be difficult in some cases to simultaneously defend against privacy and integrity attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data privacy in the Internet of Things based on anonymization: A review A mutation-based approach for the formal and automated analysis of security ceremonies StegEdge: Privacy protection of unknown sensitive attributes in edge intelligence via deception IsaNet: A framework for verifying secure data plane protocols A review on cloud security issues and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1