安全合同的性质与内容:挑战与建议

P. Graydon, I. Bate
{"title":"安全合同的性质与内容:挑战与建议","authors":"P. Graydon, I. Bate","doi":"10.1109/PRDC.2014.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software engineering researchers have extensively explored the reuse of components at source-code level. Contracts explicitly describe component behaviour, reducing development risk by exposing potential incompatibilities early in the development process. But to benefit fully from reuse, developers of safety-critical systems must also reuse safety evidence. Full reuse would require both extending the existing notion of component contracts to cover safety properties and using these contracts in both component selection and system certification. This is not as simple as it first appears. Much of the review, analysis, and test evidence developers provide during certification is system-specific. This makes it difficult to define safety contracts that facilitate both selecting components to reuse and certifying systems. In this paper, we explore the definition and use of safety contracts, identify challenges to component-based software reuse safety-critical systems, present examples to illustrate several key difficulties, and discuss potential solutions to these problems.","PeriodicalId":187000,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 20th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nature and Content of Safety Contracts: Challenges and Suggestions for a Way Forward\",\"authors\":\"P. Graydon, I. Bate\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRDC.2014.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software engineering researchers have extensively explored the reuse of components at source-code level. Contracts explicitly describe component behaviour, reducing development risk by exposing potential incompatibilities early in the development process. But to benefit fully from reuse, developers of safety-critical systems must also reuse safety evidence. Full reuse would require both extending the existing notion of component contracts to cover safety properties and using these contracts in both component selection and system certification. This is not as simple as it first appears. Much of the review, analysis, and test evidence developers provide during certification is system-specific. This makes it difficult to define safety contracts that facilitate both selecting components to reuse and certifying systems. In this paper, we explore the definition and use of safety contracts, identify challenges to component-based software reuse safety-critical systems, present examples to illustrate several key difficulties, and discuss potential solutions to these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 20th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 20th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2014.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 20th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2014.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

软件工程研究人员已经在源代码级别广泛地探索了组件的重用。契约显式地描述组件行为,通过在开发过程的早期暴露潜在的不兼容性来降低开发风险。但是,为了从重用中充分获益,安全关键系统的开发人员也必须重用安全证据。完全重用既需要扩展组件契约的现有概念以涵盖安全属性,又需要在组件选择和系统认证中使用这些契约。这并不像最初看起来那么简单。开发人员在认证期间提供的许多审查、分析和测试证据都是特定于系统的。这使得定义安全契约变得困难,这些安全契约既可以方便地选择要重用的组件,也可以方便地对系统进行认证。在本文中,我们探讨了安全契约的定义和使用,确定了对基于组件的软件重用安全关键系统的挑战,提出了一些例子来说明几个关键的困难,并讨论了这些问题的潜在解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Nature and Content of Safety Contracts: Challenges and Suggestions for a Way Forward
Software engineering researchers have extensively explored the reuse of components at source-code level. Contracts explicitly describe component behaviour, reducing development risk by exposing potential incompatibilities early in the development process. But to benefit fully from reuse, developers of safety-critical systems must also reuse safety evidence. Full reuse would require both extending the existing notion of component contracts to cover safety properties and using these contracts in both component selection and system certification. This is not as simple as it first appears. Much of the review, analysis, and test evidence developers provide during certification is system-specific. This makes it difficult to define safety contracts that facilitate both selecting components to reuse and certifying systems. In this paper, we explore the definition and use of safety contracts, identify challenges to component-based software reuse safety-critical systems, present examples to illustrate several key difficulties, and discuss potential solutions to these problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reduction of NBTI-Induced Degradation on Ring Oscillators in FPGA Region-Adherent Algorithms: Restricting the Impact of Faults on Service Quality CloudBFT: Elastic Byzantine Fault Tolerance Reliable Shortest Paths in Wireless Sensor Networks: Refocusing on Link Failure Scenarios from Applications Responsiveness of Service Discovery in Wireless Mesh Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1