{"title":"几个带有注释和注释的NoSQL数据库之间的比较","authors":"B. Tudorică, Cristian Bucur","doi":"10.1109/ROEDUNET.2011.5993686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is trying to comment on the various NoSQL (Not only Structured Query Language) systems and to make a comparison (using multiple criteria) between them. The NoSQL databases were created as a mean to offer high performance (both in terms of speed and size) and high availability at the price of loosing the ACID (Atomic, Consistent, Isolated, Durable) trait of the traditional databases in exchange with keeping a weaker BASE (Basic Availability, Soft state, Eventual consistency) feature. Remains to be seen which of the multiple solutions created since the official appearance of the NoSQL concept (which was defined in 1998 and reintroduced in 2009, around which moment several NoSQL solutions emerged; at the present moment there are known over 120 such solutions) are really delivering on these promises of higher performance (although several of them are already used with very good results).","PeriodicalId":277269,"journal":{"name":"2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"282","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments and notes\",\"authors\":\"B. Tudorică, Cristian Bucur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROEDUNET.2011.5993686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is trying to comment on the various NoSQL (Not only Structured Query Language) systems and to make a comparison (using multiple criteria) between them. The NoSQL databases were created as a mean to offer high performance (both in terms of speed and size) and high availability at the price of loosing the ACID (Atomic, Consistent, Isolated, Durable) trait of the traditional databases in exchange with keeping a weaker BASE (Basic Availability, Soft state, Eventual consistency) feature. Remains to be seen which of the multiple solutions created since the official appearance of the NoSQL concept (which was defined in 1998 and reintroduced in 2009, around which moment several NoSQL solutions emerged; at the present moment there are known over 120 such solutions) are really delivering on these promises of higher performance (although several of them are already used with very good results).\",\"PeriodicalId\":277269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"282\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROEDUNET.2011.5993686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROEDUNET.2011.5993686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 282
摘要
本文试图对各种NoSQL (Not only Structured Query Language)系统进行评论,并在它们之间(使用多个标准)进行比较。创建NoSQL数据库是为了提供高性能(在速度和大小方面)和高可用性,代价是失去传统数据库的ACID(原子性、一致性、隔离性、持久性)特性,以保持较弱的BASE(基本可用性、软状态、最终一致性)特性。自NoSQL概念(1998年定义,2009年重新引入)正式出现以来,出现了哪些解决方案还有待观察,大约在哪个时刻出现了几个NoSQL解决方案;目前,已知有超过120个这样的解决方案)真正实现了这些更高性能的承诺(尽管其中一些已经使用并取得了非常好的结果)。
A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments and notes
This paper is trying to comment on the various NoSQL (Not only Structured Query Language) systems and to make a comparison (using multiple criteria) between them. The NoSQL databases were created as a mean to offer high performance (both in terms of speed and size) and high availability at the price of loosing the ACID (Atomic, Consistent, Isolated, Durable) trait of the traditional databases in exchange with keeping a weaker BASE (Basic Availability, Soft state, Eventual consistency) feature. Remains to be seen which of the multiple solutions created since the official appearance of the NoSQL concept (which was defined in 1998 and reintroduced in 2009, around which moment several NoSQL solutions emerged; at the present moment there are known over 120 such solutions) are really delivering on these promises of higher performance (although several of them are already used with very good results).